On Dec 8, 2007 2:22 AM, Jeremy Keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was chatting with title="Tantek Çelik"> href="http://tantek.com/";>Tantek yesterday.
>
> So, quick straw poll: does that look a reasonable use of the CITE
> element? Does anything think that SPAN would be a better/safer op
On Dec 8, 2007 2:22 AM, Jeremy Keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I don't think that every use of the CITE element *requires*
> an accompanying citation (using Q or BLOQCKQUOTE). I think that Scott
> is write when he says that context is the key criteria:
The CITE element doesn't require
Jeremy wrote:
> I was chatting with title="Tantek Çelik"> href="http://tantek.com/";>Tantek yesterday.
>
> So, quick straw poll: does that look a reasonable use of the CITE
> element?
I think it depends on the surrounding text. If the next sentence is "He
made a really interesting point ab
Paul Wilkins wrote:
it makes no sense to have a citation all by itself.
As time goes on, people have been using the cite element for more and
more inappropriate uses.
I agree with you there. But the abuse I see is more along the lines
of using the CITE element where a Q or BLOCKQUOTE would b
