On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:11 AM, Lorenzo De Tomasi wrote:
But now the question is which is the correct ISO 8601 timestamp?
2008-01-29T11:42:00+01:00 or 2008-01-29T11:42:00+0100?
Both are valid per ISO 8601. Here's the full spec:
Scott Reynen wrote:
Lorenzo De Tomasi wrote:
But now the question is which is the correct ISO 8601 timestamp?
2008-01-29T11:42:00+01:00 or 2008-01-29T11:42:00+0100?
Both are valid per ISO 8601.
True. But it is worth remembering that ISO 8601 encompases a whole range
of different datetime
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This is an unjust punishment, especially considering that he is one of
the largest contributors to our community. Rather than
Manu Sporny wrote:
I'd like to see the ban on Andy reduced to a month or lifted
completely.
I shall be concise, because Manu has already gone into plenty of
details, but...
+1
--
Toby A Inkster
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tobyinkster.co.uk
I must say I was embarrassed to read Manu's response to Andy's ban due
to not speaking out about the ban sooner. I felt that there must have
been something that the admins knew better then myself about this
'slowing down the process' business. I was nevertheless shocked to
hear about the ban
+1
--
Sincerely,
Jeff McNeill
http://jeffmcneill.com/
On 3/8/08, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This is an unjust
Hello
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I have had more purposeful discussion with people off-list than on-list as of
late
Unfortunately, I'd have to agree with this too.
A number things I've done lately have been under the banner of
Semantic HTML
On 3/9/08, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This is an unjust punishment, especially considering that he is one of
the
1.) Quantity != Quality. (Maybe Web 2.0 decided otherwise, but I'm old
school.)
2.) No one person is worth more than the cohesiveness of a community in
the case of community development.
3.) Andy != Gandhi. Overthrowing the rule of a foreign power is
unrelated to anything that happens in
Derrick,
I'd like to address each of your statements as they seem to be assuming
things that were not said in the post to the mailing list.
Derrick Lyndon Pallas wrote:
1.) Quantity != Quality. (Maybe Web 2.0 decided otherwise, but I'm old
school.)
The argument that quantity == quality was
10 matches
Mail list logo
