Simply a matter of definition.
Well, quite. And there's more than one.
In this context, microformats may be considered to be something like a
brand.
Like hoover or biro..?
I keep wanting to jump in and add something of real use to the community at
large but I keep seeing stuff that seems
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charles Roper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in addition to other things said:
Should bin, var, cult, etc., be written in full? (I think not, to
save bloating file sizes)
These abbreviations are absolutely fine within the very narrow domain of
biological nomenclature and
Hey Mike,
This is an very good/interesting example...
In my opinion amount is a really difficult one to abbreviate (or any measure
for that matter) as it can be used to describe a lot of other things for
which there is not yet a microformat but cur (for currency) is interesting
as just off the
I've been reading with interest the discussion between Andy and Tantek and I
need to make a comment, take it for what it is my thought and nothing more.
Wiki Editing and Process:
As I understand it a Wiki is a site which allows users to add and edit
content collectively, but what this definition
Tantek wrote:
...
I like the suggestions of opening up microformats-dev as well.
Anybody else on the list have thoughts?
I am using microformats extensively in my project but at the moment it is
not ready for the light of day (soon I hope/plan) so I have not added myself
to the implementations
