How 'bout that! But what does that mean?
Begin forwarded message:
And for the really geeky, we have a surprise: Twitter now fully
supports microformats. Now that is pretty geektastic.
Happy Twittering!
-Biz Stone and the Twitter Team
http://twitter.com/biz
__
On May 13, 2007, at 8:16 PM, Kevin Marks wrote:
On May 13, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Chris Messina wrote:
XFN. All of the side bars use [rel=contact].
-ryan
So yeah, it's hAtom + hCard + XFN. Pretty good, especially since we
haven't seen too much hAtom pickup outside of a few WordPress blogs.
Also
Hi Evan,
I like it! This would also be useful for linking to the editable
version of data for a REST Service Description.
-enp
On May 25, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
Hi, everybody.
** Context **
So, on the tail of RecentChangesCamp Montreal
(http://www.rocococamp.info/), there
Guillaume,
On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Tantek Çelik wrote:
Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch of us
have
decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy acronym, but the
only problem is that it is mor
Hi Andy,
On Jul 18, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
At the moment this experiment does not (yet) supercede the
boilerplate
at Template:MicroFormatCopyrightStatement2004, which may be updated
for some pages when and if all of their contributors choose to
adopt
this convention.
Hi Andy,
On Jul 20, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Please consider adding "retroactively" or "all past, present and
future contributions" to the text.
I think any attempt to change the terms of a statement whereby
people have released some of their rights, after they have done so,
[Apologies if this is off-topic, but I'm not sure where/how else to
discuss this]
Hi Joe,
On Jul 31, 2007, at 9:54 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
I expect that many of the leadership find this train of thought
distasteful. It is, as it stinks of unproductive legal
confrontations. But such are a pa
Hi Dmitri,
On Aug 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
My intent is to use XOXO for configuration (remember plists discussion
from a while back?) and I would like to make sure I don't write code
that does something unacceptable or illogical.
Since there is not much heard anymore about th
Hi Manu,
On Aug 2, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
The reasoning for not discussing legal matters on the list is not
clear.
It is ironic that in an open community, such as this, that we have any
taboo topics... but here we are.
I an not a lawyer, but my understanding is that any public
Hi Ben,
On Aug 2, 2007, at 9:05 PM, Ben Buchanan wrote:
The informal approach worked well when the community was new and
smaller, but now that it's ramping up it doesn't seem to be coping.
I'm not claiming there's an easy answer, but we should start by
accepting there's a problem.
I strongly e
Cool idea -- thanks, Andy!
On Aug 26, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
The number of exploratory discussions on the wiki's main page had
grown
to the point where it was hard to see what was current, what was
abandoned or moribund, or simply to see what was there at all,
Accordingly,
Hi all,
On Sep 7, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
or 2) leave the specs where they are and create new -intro pages.
I've seen [...] no one object to #2.
Then you haven't been paying full attention.
For those of us who indeed haven't been paying full attention to
this particular
Hi Tantek,
On Oct 18, 2007, at 9:15 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
I will personally commit to (as I think the other admins will,
though I am
not speaking for them) improving the documentation of who the admins
are,
and the minimal processes that the admins follow, because, one of our
objectives is
Hi Gareth,
On Feb 18, 2008, at 3:51 PM, gareth rushgrove wrote:
The idea of using Microformats as a replacement for a seperate API
layer has been mooted for a while*. But in general this has been a
discussion about Read APIs (ie. asking for data) as apposed to Write
APIs (ie. adding data).
I'm
me to explain and document your actions
clearly. I'm sure this was a difficult decision, but I appreciate the
hard work all of the admins have put in to do this as fairly as
possible.
Sincerely,
Ernest Prabhakar
___
microformats-discuss ma
Hi all,
On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Toby A Inkster wrote:
Manu Sporny wrote:
I'd like to see the ban on Andy reduced to a month or lifted
completely.
I shall be concise, because Manu has already gone into plenty of
details, but...
+1
I don't know about "Unjust" --- I sympathize with th
Hi Manu,
On Mar 11, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Manu Sporny wrote:
To date, 10 people
have voiced concern about the length of Andy's ban and the methods
used
to ban him. That is a clear indicator that there is a disconnect
between
the admins and the community.
I encourage you (and everyone) to add
Hi John et al,
On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:27 PM, John Allsopp wrote:
But I'd suggest that lack of piping up on this form is not entirely
evidence that people don't care.
If people *do* care, I encourage them to sign the "petition" on
governance-issues, as you have:
http://microformats.org/wik
18 matches
Mail list logo
