I'm at the Web 2.0 summit. Any MF folks around who want to meet up?
Ian
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
On 08/03/2007 13:47, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
That's where Microformats come into the picture. Add the hCard
"family-name" subproperty to each local expression:
Costello
Novak
Smith
Johnson
Parker
Now the information is resolutely specific and local; simultaneously,
it is globally and col
Hi Ara,
On 08/03/2007 19:43, Ara Pehlivanian wrote:
What I think your contrast of microformats' bottleneck with the web's
free growth is missing is the notion that there indeed /was/ a
"bottleneck" in the development of the web in the form of Tim
Berners-Lee. It's just that it was all up front a
On 08/03/2007 21:55, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Mar 8, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Ian Davis wrote:
This means there's a limit to the scalability of the mf development
process.
Yes, there is. I think that's made pretty clear on the about page:
microformats are not:
...
- infinitely extensibl
On 09/03/2007 09:06, Kevin Marks wrote:
On Mar 8, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Danny Ayers wrote:
For example, Novak etc. might work fine,
but imagine you later discover an established practice amongst
biologists: Microhylidae. Turns out
their existing systems consider your Costellos, Novaks and Smiths
On 01/05/2007 07:26, Tantek Çelik wrote:
It's been tried by numerous groups, before microformats, and after. It's
even been tried in the context of RSS and RDF, and in practice people write
scrapers that look for namespace prefixes as if they are part of the element
name, not as mere shorthands
On 01/05/2007 17:03, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Hello Tantek,
I think Ian may have meant... what about using (for Microformats)
namespaces with pre-defined (and never changing) namespace prefixes
(like in Java and Perl), instead of variable namespace prefixes (like
in XML).
Yes. Of course
Hi Ernie,
On 31/05/2006 18:09, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
From my admittedly naive perspective, eRDF looks like it *could* be
used in a way that is compatible with microformats. That is, not *all*
eRDF schemas and documents *are* necessarily microformats, but many of
them _could_ be. Conv
