Re: [uf-discuss] Yahoo Profiles

2008-10-17 Thread Philip Tellis
2008/10/17 David Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just read [1] about Yahoo's new profiles. Does anyone know if Microformats are supported? Not that I can see, but if not, I'll put in a feature request. ___ microformats-discuss mailing list

Re: [uf-discuss] ISO Dates and Durations

2008-09-24 Thread Philip Tellis
2008/9/24 Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: people do not have any problems of putting machine data in the head of a document, for example service discovery links and meta details such as keywords and descriptions. its worth a little thought a think? From a performance point of view, dumping

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Standardized Representation of Microformats in PHP/other languages

2008-04-03 Thread Philip Tellis
On 03/04/2008, Ciaran McNulty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There appears to be a Zend::Json package that can decode() JSON - simple testing makes it appear that it parses the JSON output of hKit identically (when told to return an object rather than an array). I'm jumping on to this a little

Re: [uf-discuss] Unjust banning of Andy Mabbett

2008-03-14 Thread Philip Tellis
On 13/03/2008, Eric A. Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: e-mail and IM servers. (Do communication protocols even use handshakes any more?) yes ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats for Write APIs

2008-02-18 Thread Philip Tellis
On 18/02/2008, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that comment spammers would love that too! spammers are going to find ways to get at their targets no matter what you do to stop them. The only good way to fight spam is through pattern and content analysis (including IP and ISP

Re: [uf-discuss] Some questions about Microformats implementation

2008-01-20 Thread Philip Tellis
On 20/01/2008, Bruno Miguel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool. :) The style=display:none is there because I'm a bit of a privacy maniac. It's the best way I know to give some kind of protection to my email addresses. If you know a better one, please share it with me, so I can make the addresses

Re: [uf-discuss] Hcard - marking up sms short codes

2008-01-08 Thread Philip Tellis
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good point. The nearest at the moment is type=cell, but since such numbers usually cannot be dialled for voice calls, that's not really I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled for voice calls?

Re: [uf-discuss] Hcard - marking up sms short codes

2008-01-08 Thread Philip Tellis
On 08/01/2008, Jim O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled for voice calls? I think the problem is that they can, but SMS short numbers can't. so should there be a way to distinguish voice enabled numbers from SMS only numbers and data

Re: [uf-discuss] Hcard - marking up sms short codes

2008-01-08 Thread Philip Tellis
On 08/01/2008, Guillaume Lebleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adding a TEL TYPE value 'sms' seems to be a viable possible option. It is just another service available @ the phone number, just like voice, fax, etc. so what we're looking at, is really two axes... one is the service running at the

Re: [uf-discuss] Hcard - marking up sms short codes

2008-01-08 Thread Philip Tellis
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps, but I'd slice it three ways and add more: service: voice, sms, fax, data, textphone, freephone connection: landline, mobile I'm not sure I'd bother distinguishing between landline and mobile, for the

Re: [uf-discuss] Hcard - marking up sms short codes

2008-01-08 Thread Philip Tellis
On 08/01/2008, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It might be of interest to people in some places - especially when there may be differences between the costs of making a call to a landline or a mobile. eg .. here in Sydney if I'm calling a local landline number from another landline it is

Re: [uf-discuss] Subject tagging

2007-12-17 Thread Philip Tellis
On 17/12/2007, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People wrote: Re: [uf-new] [Fwd: Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Precise Expansion Patterns] Please, everyone, remove [uf-discuss] from subject lines when moving threads to uf-new (and vice versa); since people sort mail into folders, based on those

Re: [uf-discuss] using microschema

2007-11-25 Thread Philip Tellis
On 25/11/2007, Tatsuya Noyori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I changed link to a. Is this correct? AFAIK, a tags need some text inside. -- hello world ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org

Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus — microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Philip Tellis
On 20/09/2007, Ciaran McNulty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whatever character you have before that f isn't 7-bit Usenet compliant. Is this list available on Usenet? well, what you do is, you blast all possible 8 bit sequences through usenet,

Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus - microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Philip Tellis
On 20/09/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So am I right in understanding that a parser should always ignore the contents of abbr? In which case, do the parsing rules need revisiting? except that in this case, the postal-code element is not abbr, but span, and it has no title.

Re: [uf-discuss] Storing Microformats

2007-09-17 Thread Philip Tellis
On 18/09/2007, Paul Kinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One of the other ideas that I am toying with is a Microformat spider, that crawls the web looking for microformats, storing them and then allowing them to be searched. My question is: How are people storing the data present in microformats