Ben Ward wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your feedback on the value-title work. It's moving along
quite nicely.
On 6 Feb 2009, at 03:04, Robert O'Rourke wrote:
Anyway there was a bit of discussion on strackoverflow and a clever
chap called Cristoph suggested using the VAR ta
Hello everyone,
I was following some discussion on Andy Clarke's blog a while ago and it
led me to Ben's work on the value-title design pattern. Awesome work Ben :)
In the interests of doing something pragmatic (but probably not that
useful in hindsight) I made a jquery plugin to stop the too
Martin McEvoy wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 12:29 +, Robert O'Rourke wrote:
Martin McEvoy wrote:
I AM worried that we should be using "title" instead of "role" in some
cases...
That depends if you look at a piece of music as having "jobs"
Martin McEvoy wrote:
Hello Robert
Hi Martin, nice meeting you the other day
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 18:39 +, Robert O'Rourke wrote:
For cover tracks you'd have something like:
Original Artist -
Primal Scream
Here is the best action I have seen using rol
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert O'Rourke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
How about removing the 'contributor' class from the key creator's
vcard? It would make sense to me to group contributors separately to
the creator. The vcard attache
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin McEvoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 01:56 +1100, Michael MD wrote:
>Why doesn't the following work for you, then?
>
>
> Primal Scream -
> Screamadelica
>
That may be fine for someone who just wants to mark up
Ciaran McNulty wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 3:19 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
1. 16:03 isn't an abbreviation for 12 September 2007. That's
/additional/ information. So that should be a SPAN not an ABBR.
That was Benjam
Angus McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, December 13, 2007 12:44 pm, Robert O'Rourke wrote:
Perhaps in the case of a podcast or video blog you could tell your
feed-reader what format you prefer and it would grab the right file.
That's one possibility but I don't know of anyone who does
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
I know it defeats the object semantically speaking but what are the
other arguments against putting the machine-readable date/time in the
class attribute and do they outweigh the gain in accessibility?
For example, what's wrong
Andy Mabbett wrote:
On Thu, December 13, 2007 09:27, Jeff McNeill wrote:
Use cases for alternates could be as follows:
[...]
Thank you. That explains what "alternates" are; but not how the proposed
microformat would be /used/. In other words, what would a user agent *do*
with them?
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael
Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Just to say that hCalendar is used fairly extensively to describe
broadcasts on bbc.co.uk/programmes here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/genres/music
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes
11 matches
Mail list logo
