I noticed that 'accessed date' wasn't discussed in the resulting thread here.
As far as I know, it doesn't map to any 'official' field in BibTeX.*
It is perfectly fine to include it as a new field: 'accessed-date' or
something:
@misc{aslbp:2005,
title={A short-lived blog post},
accessed-date= {11/2005},
...}
If I wanted to display it in my citations list using bibtex and the
style files I've used, I'd put it in the 'note' field like this:
note={accessed on 11/2005}.
I'd prefer the 'accessed-date' solution, because it's more meaningful.
-mike
* meaning I'm not aware of any common style files that use it. There
could be plenty that aren't common or I haven't seen...
On 11/13/06, Brian Suda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, i have wiki-fied several citation examples from a previous
email, with accessed date. I have not updated any implied-schemas to
reflect any changes yet. I haven't outputted the accessed date into
BibTeX, RIS or Dublin Core because i don't know what field they equate
too? Alot of this will get flushed out when we start building examples
and tests.
All input is welcomed.
Thanks,
-brian
--
brian suda
http://suda.co.uk
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Michael McCracken
UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
