[uf-discuss] [rethinking abbr] Does object deserve another look?

2007-04-30 Thread Ryan Cannon
Perhaps I'm getting into this a bit late and this has already been brought up, but I've skimmed through the conversation and haven't seen it. Tantek's original proposal[1] was scrapped because it didn't work in Safari 1.2.1 (WebKit v125). Hasn't that particular browser version been

Re: [uf-discuss] [rethinking abbr] Does object deserve another look?

2007-04-30 Thread James Craig
The main problem, as I understood it, is that object[data] expects a URI, even if it doesn't know how to handle it, so the first suggestion is actually requesting the relative path ./20050125 which causes extra junk 404s (Ex. 1; not necessarily a bug). Some UAs even requested relative

Re: [uf-discuss] [rethinking abbr] Does object deserve another look?

2007-04-30 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 1 mai 2007 à 09:53, James Craig a écrit : The main problem, as I understood it, is that object[data] expects a URI, even if it doesn't know how to handle it, so the first suggestion is actually requesting the relative path ./ 20050125 which causes extra junk 404s (Ex. 1; not necessarily