In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sarven Capadisli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
A further advantage of this method has just occurred to me; it could use
plain-language *and* machine values in one title, thus:
4.03pm
and we could even exempt parentheses:
On 2/8/08, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> >Early in December, I made the following suggestion, but in a separate,
> >and unclearly-titled thread.
> >
> >I'm reposting it here, in a new thread, in the hope that
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Early in December, I made the following suggestion, but in a separate,
>and unclearly-titled thread.
>
>I'm reposting it here, in a new thread, in the hope that it will
>warrant discussion:
[prefix changed to "data"]
>
On 2/1/08 10:57, "Andy Mabbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul
> Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>> There are other ways to hide information from people while still
>> allowing it to be accessible by machines.
>> For example:
>>
>
> There is no guar
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul
Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
There are other ways to hide information from people while still
allowing it to be accessible by machines.
For example:
There is no guarantee that comments will be delivered to the end user -
many compression algorithm
On Jan 2, 2008 10:51 AM, Dmitry Baranovskiy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This probably was raised before, but I didn't find it. Why we can't
> put these values into class? It seems to me semantically correct:
> additional meaning. It is as easy to parse as title and it removes
> accessibility issue
This probably was raised before, but I didn't find it. Why we can't
put these values into class? It seems to me semantically correct:
additional meaning. It is as easy to parse as title and it removes
accessibility issue completely.
As soon as we are going to use prefix let's gain more benefi
Early in December, I made the following suggestion, but in a separate,
and unclearly-titled thread.
I'm reposting it here, in a new thread, in the hope that it will warrant
discussion:
#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#
While I understand the desire to avoid namespacing per se, using:
2:23
or
