I'm a little confused about the current state of the grouping
proposal. I'm not sure even if the uf-community is working on a
general solution (a microformat for grouping any sort of items) (+1
vote) or a particular solution for some of the existing microformats
(0 votes).
I think some sort of gro
I think the grouping mechanism can be accomplished with XOXO,
http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo
--Bob.
>>> 1 Jul 2008 18:08 Xavier Badosa >>>
> I'm a little confused about the current state of the grouping
> proposal. I'm not sure even if the uf-community is working on a
> general solution (
> I think the grouping mechanism can be accomplished with XOXO,
XOXO as it is now (or as I understand it) is based on list elements
(ol ul dl), and these are not suited for "grouping" purposes, not in
my sense at least: maybe I should say "classing" instead of "grouping"
because in my meaning the
I'm a little confused about the current state of the grouping
proposal. I'm not sure even if the uf-community is working on a
general solution (a microformat for grouping any sort of items) (+1
vote) or a particular solution for some of the existing microformats
(0 votes).
I think some sort of gro
I'm a little confused about the current state of the grouping
proposal. I'm not sure even if the uf-community is working on a
general solution (a microformat for grouping any sort of items) (+1
vote) or a particular solution for some of the existing microformats
(0 votes).
I think some sort of gro
