Re: [uf-discuss] Has the cowpath for these XFN values faded away: friend, co-worker, muse, etc?

2008-03-19 Thread Tom Morris
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Costello, Roger L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This puzzles me. Microformats are about paving existing cowpaths. I > presume the authors of XFN saw a clear cowpath for not only "contact" > and "me", but for all the other XFN values, such as "friend", > "co-wo

Re: [uf-discuss] Has the cowpath for these XFN values faded away: friend, co-worker, muse, etc?

2008-03-19 Thread Ryan King
On Mar 18, 2008, at 9:18 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote: Chris Messina wrote[1]: "... you'll find that, by and large, the majority of XFN links on the web are using either rel-contact or rel-me." I have been looking at various social networks for the last week, and Chris' statement is consistent w

[uf-discuss] Has the cowpath for these XFN values faded away: friend, co-worker, muse, etc?

2008-03-18 Thread Costello, Roger L.
Hi Folks, Chris Messina wrote[1]: "... you'll find that, by and large, the majority of XFN links on the web are using either rel-contact or rel-me." I have been looking at various social networks for the last week, and Chris' statement is consistent with what I have seen - most web pages just us