Re: [uf-discuss] One more shot at accessible hCalendar

2008-05-21 Thread Ciaran McNulty
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Zhang Zhen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But someone might argue that "2008-5-21T09:22+08:00" wouldn't be a > human-readable date. As far as I know, HTML4.01 doesn't offer an > attribute for the machine-readable purpose and abbr design pattern > seems relatively the

Re: [uf-discuss] One more shot at accessible hCalendar

2008-05-21 Thread Zhang Zhen
2008/5/14 Belov, Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Site visitor accessibility: > > Even if a particular screen reader can disable abbreviations or titles > so as not to hear ISO-format dates read, that means that screen reader > would also not read human-friendly titles that have nothing to do with >

[uf-discuss] One more shot at accessible hCalendar

2008-05-13 Thread Belov, Charles
I'll try to keep this to new comments concerning the use of the ISO date in the hCalendar microformat. Please excuse me if I'm repeating something. At the moment, these are the things that would prevent me from implementing hCalendar on our website. - Site visitor accessibility: Even if a pa