Ed Summers wrote:
On 12/21/05, Phillip Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've added this to the book review template for the Structured
Blogging plugins, and put an example on cite-brainstorming#OpenURL in
the wiki.
Thanks Phil and Dan! When can we expect the openurl/coins support in
On 12/21/05, Phillip Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've added this to the book review template for the Structured
> Blogging plugins, and put an example on cite-brainstorming#OpenURL in
> the wiki.
Thanks Phil and Dan! When can we expect the openurl/coins support in
structured blogging to b
In related news, Daniel Chudnov (who wrote this:
http://curtis.med.yale.edu/dchud/resolvable/) got in touch to point
out COinS, which is a (fairly cryptic-looking) microformat that embeds
OpenURL information inside HTML:
http://ocoins.info/
It seems to be in current use: http://ocoins.inf
Greetings,
I've actually been looking at this problem from another angle, and
considered submitting a microformat about it. What we're really
looking for is not solely citation data (such as ISBN), but
bibliographic information. Perhaps a good method for starting is to
break down the rele
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:39 PM, brian suda wrote:
I know there has been alot of talk about a television microformat,
IMHO
i think that is just a very specialised version of a citation
microformat, with additional specialised fields.
Thanks Brian.
B.K. DeLong and I had committed to researching
Ryan Cannon wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>I've actually been looking at this problem from another angle, and
>considered submitting a microformat about it. What we're really looking
>for is not solely citation data (such as ISBN), but bibliographic
>information. Perhaps a good method for starting is to br
Greetings,
I've actually been looking at this problem from another angle, and
considered submitting a microformat about it. What we're really looking
for is not solely citation data (such as ISBN), but bibliographic
information. Perhaps a good method for starting is to break down the
relevant info
80% is exactly the point, i have started to put together a list of
"common" citation types, MODS, BibTeX, Dublin Core, etc. Then trying to
map the names between the many different formats, DC.Title->Title,
Bibtex.year->DC.Date, etc.
Then when we find all the common propties, we just give them our
On 12/20/05, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Suda and I have had some on-again, off-again discussions
> regarding a citation microformat. As this thread points out, solving
> the whole thing in one shot is rather tricky.
Well, perhaps rather than solving 100% of the citation problems
Brian Suda and I have had some on-again, off-again discussions
regarding a citation microformat. As this thread points out, solving
the whole thing in one shot is rather tricky.
So, what we've come up with as a starting point is identifying design
patterns and working on those first. I've tried to
On 12/20/05, Ed Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Expecting microformatters to learn AACR2 and MARC's byzantine
> tagging mechanism is a non starter. By definition MARC (Machine
> Readable Cataloging) was designed for machines to read--not humans.
> This is evident in the numeric tags th
On 12/20/05, Benjamin Carlyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MARC is typically used for cataloging rather than citation. It is the
> electronic equivalent to a paper card catalogue in your local library.
> Cataloging and citation are targeted at slightly different audiences.
> Citation is targetted a
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 23:23 -0600, Edward Summers wrote:
> We've actually been throwing around some of these on the wiki:
> http://microformats.org/wiki/cite
> http://microformats.org/wiki/cite-brainstorming
> http://microformats.org/wiki/cite-examples
> MARC, or MARC21 as it is k
Edward Summers wrote:
Perhaps the example could look something like this in XHTML:
[...]
It would be nice to have this on the wiki somewhere, perhaps on the
http://microformats.org/wiki/cite-brainstorming ?
Sure - I've added it, and the example links, to the bottom of that page.
Cheers,
If it's not important to look like MARC data, take a look at the MODS
and Dublin Core transformations, which are more human-friendly
representations of this sort of data:
http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/Sandburg/sandburgmods.xml
http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/Sandburg/sandburgdc.
We've actually been throwing around some of these on the wiki:
http://microformats.org/wiki/cite
http://microformats.org/wiki/cite-brainstorming
http://microformats.org/wiki/cite-examples
MARC, or MARC21 as it is known after the harmonization of USMARC and
CAN/M
On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:21 PM, Phillip Pearson wrote:
Perhaps the example could look something like this in XHTML:
Arithmetic /
By Sandburg, Carlspan>, 1878-1967, and class="illustrator">Rand, Ted
Publisher: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich, San Diegospan>
Published: 1993
A poem about numbers a
Thanks Benjamin. I'm actually not after an XML-coded
raw MARC format, let me explain the use case a little
better.
Our library has RSS feeds for all sorts of patron searches
through the catalog (note "patron", not "cataloger"). I'm
aiming for a microformat to mark up that RSS so that
a minimally
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 16:32 +1300, Phillip Pearson wrote:
> This would probably make more sense over on the microformats-discuss
> list. Edward - visit
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss/ to join.
> Edward Vielmetti wrote:
> >I'm looking for suggestions for a micro
This would probably make more sense over on the microformats-discuss
list. Edward - visit
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss/ to join.
I'm crossposting this over there in case this is a solved problem already...
There are a bunch of links about encoding MARC data i
20 matches
Mail list logo
