>>Simply a matter of definition. >Well, quite. And there's more than one.
>>In this context, "microformats" may be considered to be something like a "brand". > Like hoover or biro..? I keep wanting to jump in and add something of real use to the community at large but I keep seeing stuff that seems non-constructive and I don't know how to "break through the noise". I appreciate and applaud the stewardship of the microformat leaders (Tantek, etc.). I think if people read the wiki and mail-list archives they will get an idea of the basic underlying principles of this community and will be able to contribute much; Personally while I don't want to leave the list it's unfortunately reached a certain ratio of noise to input that is way to high for my liking. I appreciate what everyone working towards the common goal has contributed and I thank you; please keep going. I still plan on releasing some microformat code for everyone to use and it is definitely baked into my product. It's unfortunate I feel I can no longer try to participate on this list but to me it has been taken over by a level of noise that is unacceptable and that my inbox really doesn't need. Again, I'd like to thank the Tantek, Ryan, Brian, Chris and others (not all mentioned) for some really great work along with constructive commentary and I hope the list gets back to a stable point where I can feel 'safe' participating. Till that time I will share on my blog what I am doing and will request comments from people here if they are willing to give them. All the best to everyone and please keep moving forward, Christopher _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss