Re: [uf-discuss] Rel-Canonical

2009-02-18 Thread Ciaran McNulty
Just catching up with this list.. It's interesting you should say that about Content-Location, I made a similar comment in a blog post [1] and there seemed to be some confusion over the exact semantics of the header. As an aside, does anyone know where google/yahoo/MSN discuss this stuff? Is it i

[uf-discuss] Rel-Canonical

2009-02-15 Thread Toby A Inkster
Brian Suda wrote: Google has started to use rel-canonical to specific the best URL for page information. It is a shame they don't seem to have openly discussed this idea before implementing it. If they had, people may have pointed out that it more or less duplicates the semantics of the ex

[uf-discuss] Rel-Canonical

2009-02-15 Thread Brian Suda
Google has started to use rel-canonical to specific the best URL for page information. This does not work across domain, so it isn't useful for saying that hCard over their on my own site a better version than this one on this site. http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-c