On Jan 4, 2008 6:02 AM, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ryan Cannon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>
> >Andy Mabbett wrote:
> >> We could simply declare, in the manner of implied-n-optimisation, that
> >> an hCard with no children ... defaults to the equiva
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ryan Cannon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Andy Mabbett wrote:
>> We could simply declare, in the manner of implied-n-optimisation, that
>> an hCard with no children ... defaults to the equivalent of the full mark-up
>> as used above.
>
>I wrote about this more than a
Andy Mabbett wrote:
> We could simply declare, in the manner of implied-n-optimisation, that
> an hCard with no children ... defaults to the equivalent of the full mark-up
> as used above.
I wrote about this more than a year ago[1] and created some wiki pages with
examples:
* http://microforma
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 22:55 +, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin
> McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> >On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 10:07 +1300, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> >> What if the include pattern could be used without having to be inside
> >> an hcard?
> >> as Joh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin
McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 10:07 +1300, Paul Wilkins wrote:
What if the include pattern could be used without having to be inside
an hcard?
as John Smith said
You could wrap it in item:
John Smith
would the class-inc
On 03/01/2008, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 21:44 +, Martin McEvoy wrote:
> > You could wrap it in item:
> >
> >
> > John Smith
> >
> >
> > would the class-include work then?
>
> Operator and Tails don't have any issues with wrapping fn in an Item and
> usi
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 21:44 +, Martin McEvoy wrote:
> You could wrap it in item:
>
>
> John Smith
>
>
> would the class-include work then?
Operator and Tails don't have any issues with wrapping fn in an Item and
using the class include
http://weborganics.co.uk/files/test.html
x2v on th
Hello Paul, Andy...
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 10:07 +1300, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> What if the include pattern could be used without having to be inside
> an hcard?
> as John Smith said
You could wrap it in item:
John Smith
would the class-include work then?
Martin
__
On Jan 4, 2008 6:00 AM, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a great many pages where a vCard is, or could be applied to a
> single data-value (such as a name) in prose, or a table, without further
> attributes being present; for example:
>
> ...as John Smith said...
>
> Curr
Andy Mabbett wrote:
Because they're the most appropriate semantics;
I don't agree with that, but I'm not going to argue about it.
and because people are already using the long-hand version of hCard to
do so.
vCard is an electronic business cards standard; hCard is not merely an
electronic bu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Guillaume Lebleu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Andy Mabbett wrote:
We could simply declare, in the manner of implied-n-optimisation, that
an hCard with no children:
as John Smith said
Why use the semantics of an electronic business cards standard to ta
Andy Mabbett wrote:
We could simply declare, in the manner of implied-n-optimisation, that
an hCard with no children:
as John Smith said
Why use the semantics of an electronic business cards standard to tag an
entity's name? isn't this an example of hammering unfit-for-hcard
conte
One of the microformat principles is (while not expressed in so many
words) that we should make life easier for publishers, and load work
onto parsers, instead.
There are a great many pages where a vCard is, or could be applied to a
single data-value (such as a name) in prose, or a table, withou
13 matches
Mail list logo
