Better than a[name] would be a[href], assuming a relevent URI scheme exists:
a href=geo:51.36,-0.05London, abbr title=United KingomUK/abbr/a
(See: http://geouri.org/)
Disadvantages would be:
1. Involves using a poorly supported URI scheme. People using browsers
that don't support the scheme
Toby Inkster wrote:
Better than a[name] would be a[href], assuming a relevent URI scheme exists:
a href=geo:51.36,-0.05London, abbr title=United KingomUK/abbr/a
(See: http://geouri.org/)
Disadvantages would be:
1. Involves using a poorly supported URI scheme. People using browsers
that don't
On 11/05/07, James Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan King wrote:
a[name has restrictions that input[name] does not have.
...snip...
1. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.2.1
Note and removed. Thanks!
Well you could always add a _0, _1, _2, ...etc suffix, couldn't you?
On May 11, 2007, at 4:03 AM, victor jalencas wrote:
On 11/05/07, James Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan King wrote:
a[name has restrictions that input[name] does not have.
...snip...
1. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.2.1
Note and removed. Thanks!
Well you could
Just a thought:
Haven't thought too much about this, but are there any obvious
gotchas to using an anchor element with name attribute as a potential
replacement for the abbr-design-pattern? The only things I can
foresee are the plus sign (+) in pre-UTC time zones and the semicolon
(;) in
On May 10, 2007, at 3:23 PM, James Craig wrote:
Just a thought:
Haven't thought too much about this, but are there any obvious
gotchas to using an anchor element with name attribute as a
potential replacement for the abbr-design-pattern?
I believe a[name] and @id need to be unique across
Ryan King wrote:
James Craig wrote:
Haven't thought too much about this, but are there any obvious
gotchas to using an anchor element with name attribute as a
potential replacement for the abbr-design-pattern?
I believe a[name] and @id need to be unique across an entire page.
This
On May 10, 2007, at 4:45 PM, James Craig wrote:
Ryan King wrote:
James Craig wrote:
Haven't thought too much about this, but are there any obvious
gotchas to using an anchor element with name attribute as a
potential replacement for the abbr-design-pattern?
I believe a[name] and @id
Ryan King wrote:
a[name has restrictions that input[name] does not have.
...snip...
1. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.2.1
Note and removed. Thanks!
http://microformats.org/wiki/assistive-technology-abbr-
results#Markup_Possibilities
James
