"John Panzer" wrote...
> Paul Bryson wrote:
>>Microformats in spam? Wow, that is some serious market penetration.
>>
> Real world spam example duly added to
> http://microformats.org/wiki/stock-symbol-examples. :)
lol
___
microformats-discuss maili
Paul Bryson wrote:
"John Panzer" wrote...
Yep, in the usages I've seen, people tend to use either the name or the
individual ticker symbol interchangeably in text. That is, the
difference between "Buy Time Warner now!" and "Buy TWX now!" seems to be
mostly a matter of style;
Microfor
"John Panzer" wrote...
> Yep, in the usages I've seen, people tend to use either the name or the
> individual ticker symbol interchangeably in text. That is, the
> difference between "Buy Time Warner now!" and "Buy TWX now!" seems to be
> mostly a matter of style;
Microformats in spam? Wow, that
Tantek Çelik wrote:
>I could however see using abbr to remove the name of the
>market/trading-floor, since common stock discussions usually omit that
>(since it is often implied by the ticker), and only provide the ticker
>symbol: e.g. MSFT
>
Yep, in the usages I've seen, people tend to use
On 2/1/06 7:12 PM, "John Panzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tantek Çelik wrote:
>
>> On 2/1/06 2:27 PM, "John Panzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Would this be acceptable as a structured "fn"?
>>>
>>> Time Warner,
>>> Inc.
>>
>>
>> Well, you could use that markup, but there are severa
Tantek Çelik wrote:
>On 2/1/06 2:27 PM, "John Panzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Would this be acceptable as a structured "fn"?
>>
>>Time Warner,
>>Inc.
>
>
>Well, you could use that markup, but there are several questionable things
>going on here.
>...
>
>2. Both "NYSE" and "TWX" are abbrevi
On 2/1/06 2:27 PM, "John Panzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tantek Çelik wrote on 2/1/2006, 12:25 PM:
>
>> On 2/1/06 12:04 PM, "Sujata Ramchandran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>>> I have been asked
>>> to provide some additional fields within hReview
>>
>> Who has asked you for this? Tha
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:01 PM, John Panzer wrote:
Ryan King wrote on 2/1/2006, 3:49 PM:
...
Unless we have significant research which demonstrates a specific
behavior here, I would not be inclined to do anything special for
stocks (beyond a normal product/business review).
I think there are reall
Ryan King wrote on 2/1/2006, 3:49 PM:
> On Feb 1, 2006, at 2:27 PM, John Panzer wrote:
> > ...
> > One goal is to ensure that the human readable content is able to
> > remain the same as today.
>
> I'm not sure what the significance of this statement is.
In order to evangelize microformats,
On Feb 1, 2006, at 2:27 PM, John Panzer wrote:
...
Note that the first line is a title which at least currently doesn't
allow markup, and the stock ticker symbol is actually nowhere
mentioned
in the body which does allow markup. So there's a dissonance here
between what the writer wants to di
Tantek Çelik wrote on 2/1/2006, 12:25 PM:
> On 2/1/06 12:04 PM, "Sujata Ramchandran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > I have been asked
> > to provide some additional fields within hReview
>
> Who has asked you for this? That might help understand what the
> problem is
> that you are sol
On 2/1/06 12:04 PM, "Sujata Ramchandran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my initial foray in to the world of microformats.
Welcome Sujata!
> I have been asked
> to provide some additional fields within hReview
Who has asked you for this? That might help understand what the pro
Hi,
This is my initial foray in to the world of microformats. I have
been asked to provide some additional fields within hReview that can be
used for Stocks. Here's what I am suggesting based on the parameters
that I have been given.
class="hreview">
20050518T2300-0700"/>
13 matches
Mail list logo
