Will the contributors who kindly provided the button icons on:
http://microformats.org/wiki/buttons
please indicate on that page, that those images are either in the public
domain or available under a specified free license, as per the new
section:
ebay have replied to my suggestion that they adopt uFs, using what I
suspect is standard wording:
Thank you for taking the time to send us your idea related to
microformats.
[...]
We are always pleased to hear from members of the eBay community
and
There are now -examples, -formats, and -brainstorming pages somewhat
fleshed out and linked from http://microformats.org/wiki/licensing
I'd love comments on form or substance. There are some narrow questions
on -brainstorming but broadside critiques are wanted and warranted too.
I think I will
Creative Commons has been using and encouraging use of
http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-license for awhile. As noted by Evan
on http://microformats.org/wiki/rellicense-issues It's not clear how to
associate a license with part of a page, such as an image or embedded
object in the page.
I'm
At the moment, I'm looking for exactly this -- pointers to existing
actual practices. I'll note that the Feedburner approach
(http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/archives/000759.html) is different
from James Snell's link rel="license" extension for Atom. Is one or
the other in actual use?
Chris
Ryan King wrote:
[snip]
Wha? You can just use http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-license, there's
no need to replicate data today.
I think the problem of declaring licenses in html is solved- there are
already large implementations using the rel-license microformat (Yahoo
and (maybe Google)
