Re: Banning for meta-discusion [was RE: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec"References"]

On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:26 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: The big difference here (in contrast to Usenet, other lists etc.) is that this community has retained a remarkably positive and inviting tone of discussion for quite a long time, much much more so than those other forums, and those involved wi

Re: Banning for meta-discusion [was RE: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec"References"]

A small group of like-minded individuals with a common background who know each other personally is easy to organize. This was that, but it ain't no more. I'm not sure how much this applies... the group of administrators is a world wide group of volunteers. Although this hasn't always been true

Re: Banning for meta-discusion [was RE: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec"References"]

On Jan 3, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Christopher St John wrote: On 1/3/07, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, "Joe Andrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the record, I do object. Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only person (in email or IRC) who has obje

Re: Banning for meta-discusion [was RE: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec"References"]

On 1/3/07 7:11 PM, "Christopher St John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/3/07, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, "Joe Andrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> For the record, I do object. >> >> Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only person (in ema

Re: Banning for meta-discusion [was RE: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec"References"]

On 1/3/07, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, "Joe Andrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the record, I do object. Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only person (in email or IRC) who has objected to banning Andy. I'm a little late, but for the reco

Re: Banning for meta-discusion [was RE: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec"References"]

On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, "Joe Andrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tantek Ç elik wrote: >> Finally, note that this is yet another meta-discussion email >> that you have sent, and thus as promised, absent any >> objections from anyone else on the list (or IRC), you will >> shortly be banned from the mai

Banning for meta-discusion [was RE: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec"References"]

Tantek Ç elik wrote: > Finally, note that this is yet another meta-discussion email > that you have sent, and thus as promised, absent any > objections from anyone else on the list (or IRC), you will > shortly be banned from the mailing-list for a week. Tantek, For the record, I do object. I

Re: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec "References"

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> Though, bizarrely, Tantek has reverted that. > ^ >Please refrain from making ad-hominem attacks on the mailing list. You appear not to know what "ad hominem means". > I made an editor judgment call [...]

Re: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec "References"

On 1/3/07 3:35 PM, "Andy Mabbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >> two informative references: > [...] >> so I have now removed them: > > Apologies; the correct edit was: > >

Re: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec "References"

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Your passive-aggressive re-editing of the wiki and undoing editor edits >repeatedly (twice or more) is grounds fore being banned. You appear not to know what "passive aggressive" behaviour is. > You have already been banne

Re: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec "References"

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > two informative references: [...] >so I have now removed them: Apologies; the correct edit was: Though, bizarrely, Tantek has reverted that. So, it see

Re: [uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec "References"

On 1/3/07 3:20 PM, "Andy Mabbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some time ago, I added two informative references: > > > > > > to the hCard main page: > >

[uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec "References"

Some time ago, I added two informative references: to the hCard main page: Tantek has made clear recently, after I added a third: