On Jan 4, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Tantek, there is no governance for uF other than by cabal, which
historically has proven useful only in a limited scale. The
alternative, of determining a means of governance, need not create a
heavy bureaucracy, in fact, it can be liberating.
Tantek Ç elik wrote:
On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tantek Ç elik wrote:
For the record, I do object.
Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only
person (in email or
IRC) who has objected to banning Andy.
However, even as a lone voice (perhaps
On Jan 4, 2007, at 12:33 AM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Tantek, there is no governance for uF other than by cabal
IMO, that is the way it should be. You don't put new hires on your
company's steering committee, and the House doesn't approve
presidential appointments, the Senate does -- in fact,
