On Oct 21, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Charles Roper wrote:
On 21/10/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the intention is that the raw markup of a uF be
human-readable first.
This is a good point; what, exactly, should be human readable
first? I always assumed it was the rendered
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher Rines
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
And yet we have geo.
I think comparing geo and sci, etc. is not a great example as I think
geo can be thought of as a well known abbreviation.
Yes, it clearly identifies rocks, to geologists ;-)
But seriously, do you
On 21/10/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yet we have geo.
I think comparing geo and sci, etc. is not a great example as I think
geo can be thought of as a well known abbreviation.
Yes, it clearly identifies rocks, to geologists ;-)
But seriously, do you really think it's well
I think this has been mentioned before, but I'll mention it again.
From http://microformats.org/wiki/geo:
geo is a 1:1 representation of the geo property in the vCard
standard (RFC2426 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2426.txt)) in XHTML
As you can see, the authors of the spec weren't the ones
On 20/10/06, Brian Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- the tricky thing is that there are no namespaces in Microformats,
so if you use cur, sure it is scopped to 'money', but it is now a
'reserved word' for all of microformats. As it was pointed out in a
previous message, then what happens to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charles Roper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in addition to other things said:
Should bin, var, cult, etc., be written in full? (I think not, to
save bloating file sizes)
These abbreviations are absolutely fine within the very narrow domain of
biological nomenclature and
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christopher Rines
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:45 PM
To: microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Size considerations (or how to choose
abbreviations)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charles Roper
[EMAIL
