RE: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step

2006-10-17 Thread Mike Schinkel
--- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guillaume Lebleu Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:14 PM To: Microformats Discuss Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step Mike Schinkel wrote: > My opinion is this sounds like a great idea! Wil

Re: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step

2006-10-17 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Guillaume Lebleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >I suggest the current spec focuses on the top 3. I see no need to be so restrictive. -- Andy Mabbett Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: Free Our Data:

Re: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step

2006-10-17 Thread Guillaume Lebleu
Joe Andrieu wrote: This may be a fact of test bias. The test asked for four answers, so I selected four answers, and #4 for me was "Currency unit/denomination used". I didn't really have my heart in it, so to speak. Sorry for this. You're welcome to change your vote, if you want to. See ea

Re: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step

2006-10-17 Thread Guillaume Lebleu
Mike Schinkel wrote: My opinion is this sounds like a great idea! Will you be doing the edit on the current proposal? yes, I intend to do before the end of this week. I am surprised however at the number of people who felt "Currency unit/denomination used identification" was important and i

RE: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step

2006-10-16 Thread Mike Schinkel
PM To: 'Microformats Discuss' Subject: RE: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step Mike Schinkel wrote > I am surprised however at the number of people who felt "Currency > unit/denomination used identification" was important and it seems like >

RE: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step

2006-10-16 Thread Joe Andrieu
Mike Schinkel wrote > I am surprised however at the number of people who felt > "Currency unit/denomination used identification" was > important and it seems like an edge case to me. I'm hoping > that this become an optional aspect as opposed to always > required, and the same with amount, actu

RE: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step

2006-10-16 Thread Mike Schinkel
My opinion is this sounds like a great idea! Will you be doing the edit on the current proposal? I am surprised however at the number of people who felt "Currency unit/denomination used identification" was important and it seems like an edge case to me. I'm hoping that this become an optional asp