On 12/8/06, Alf Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 08 Dec 2006, at 17:26, Michael McCracken wrote:
> On 12/8/06, Alf Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 04 Dec 2006, at 21:48, Michael McCracken wrote:
>> If there are enough useful identifiers that aren't URIs (I think
>> there probably
I've added a spot in the straw format section in
citation-brainstorming to start documenting the fields we've discussed
thoroughly:
http://microformats.org/wiki/citation-brainstorming#Working_straw_schema
I put in "URI" for now, since I'm now mostly convinced that it will
solve more problems tha
On 12/8/06, Alf Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 04 Dec 2006, at 21:48, Michael McCracken wrote:
> I do think that a URL field (class="url") should be included, to
> represent a link to a copy of the cited work, and if we want to mark
> up one or more identifiers, we can use a separate class
TECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael McCracken
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:05 PM
> To: Microformats Discuss
> Subject: Re: Re: RE: [uf-discuss] [citation] url field
>
> This seems to have been buried - so again, to anyone
> interested in hCite:
>
> I want to define a n
; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael McCracken
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:05 PM
> To: Microformats Discuss
> Subject: Re: Re: RE: [uf-discuss] [citation] url field
>
> This seems to have been buried - so again, to anyone
> interested in hCite:
>
> I
This seems to have been buried - so again, to anyone interested in hCite:
I want to define a new field "URL" to denote an http URL that points
to the location of a copy of the cited work.
URIs that encode an identifier of the work can be combined with this
field, but do not need to be.
I unders
On 12/2/06, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A couple points on this subject. I have recently been doing a *lot* of
research in the area of URLs/URIs and having discussions with numerous
people on REST-discuss and www-TAG lists so I feel I'm pretty well-versed on
this subject now.
Althou
On 11/30/06, Michael McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you mean "why not call it URI?",
Yeah, that's what I mean, and worried about collapsing the notion of
URI as a name, and URL as a location. I'm skeptical we can rely on
parsing a URL fo extracting a DOI/ISBN/etc.
Bruce
_
On 11/30/06, Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/30/06, Michael McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also suggest that in the case of identifiers like a DOI or ISBN
> which can be represented as a parameter in a link to doi.org or some
> other resolver, that the format encourage u
