On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 20:52 -0500, Christian Reynolds wrote:
> I saw a Dilbert a couple years ago when Broadband over Powerline was
> a hot item. It was a cartoon strip about BroadBand over Sewerline. :)
I had forgotten about that, but I remember it now that you mention it.
I may even have it p
I saw a Dilbert a couple years ago when Broadband over Powerline was
a hot item. It was a cartoon strip about BroadBand over Sewerline. :)
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
You seen Fiber to the home. Now what about this...
--
*
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 15:31 -0500, Chris Gotstein wrote:
> I'm meeting with my representative next week. I'll be sure to share
> this with him. I'd like to watch c-span when he brings this up as an
> option in congress.
That would be MEAN! It would also be FUNNY! :-)
--
***
I'm meeting with my representative next week. I'll be sure to share
this with him. I'd like to watch c-span when he brings this up as an
option in congress.
Chris Gotstein
Sr Network Engineer
UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
500 N Stephenson Ave
Iron Mountain, MI 49801
Phone: 906-774-4847
Fax:
//www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
> RouterOS
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090402/1
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 15:26 -0500, Chris Gotstein wrote:
> Didn't they do this last year as well?
It was last year. I just thought it appropriate this year in light of
the stimulus packages and talks of all the fiber projects. :-)
--
Didn't they do this last year as well?
Chris Gotstein
Sr Network Engineer
UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
500 N Stephenson Ave
Iron Mountain, MI 49801
Phone: 906-774-4847
Fax: 906-774-0335
ch...@uplogon.com
Butch Evans wrote:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
You seen Fiber to the home. Now what abo
http://www.google.com/tisp/
You seen Fiber to the home. Now what about this...
--
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering *
* http:
lman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
> RouterOS
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090402/d9a6e2b6/attachment.html>
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Not sure on the PtP traffic, as we do not use that feature.
I believe the rate limiting is superior to mikrotik's, but i have had
only a little experience using PCQ.
I would recommend talking to the owner/developer on the PtP questions.
He's a very honest and upfront guy.
a...@netequalizer.
Thanks for the input. Does it do a better job analyzing the p2p
traffic? Does it check at Layer 7 level? With a Tik box, I've noticed
it doesn't identifiy p2p traffic as good as it once did. I know it has
a L7 ability, but it is really slow and not very intuitive.
Also from a technical sta
We've been using the NetEq boxes for about 3 years now. Very happy with
them. I think they are much easier to setup than a tik box.
They can handle Ptp as well, there are lots of options with the box.
But we keep ours pretty simple and just shape bandwidth for the
customers. We don't mess wit
I'm starting to have some problems with burst traffic on my network and
bandwidth. I've noticed many ISP's are jumping on the
Netequalizer boxes. But I'm thinking a much cheaper option would just
add a RB1000 at the edge and use PCQ and priorities. Does anyone
here have any experience with Net
13 matches
Mail list logo
