[Mikrotik] Hello List! Dynamic DNS question

://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100401/be2d6a2b/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related

Re: [Mikrotik] Hello List! Dynamic DNS question

/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100401/be2d6a2b/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

Re: [Mikrotik] Hello List! Dynamic DNS question

or like server using the dns-update package? Dylan -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100401/be2d6a2b/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

Wireless link is 3Mb at each location. Fiber is going to be 5-10Mb. Dylan On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: How many mbps? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

Was considering the AH version. The 493 doesn't appear to be much more than the 433 so 9 ports will probably win. Can you do QOS for traffic if it is going to traverse the VPN and it still take priority over all other protocols? Did that make sense? Dylan On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Josh

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

VPN is a new interface. Just priotize it accordingly. That's what conclusion I came to anyway. On 4/1/10, Dylan Bouterse dy...@acmecargo.com wrote: Was considering the AH version. The 493 doesn't appear to be much more than the 433 so 9 ports will probably win. Can you do QOS for traffic if

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

So all traffic in the VPN is prioritized equally? In that case a file transfer between locations could effect VOIP. I guess the only other option is to have the VOIP outside the VPN if that's even feasable...assuming there is no other way to classify the traffic. Dylan On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:28

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

What he meant was, as far as the router's concerned, the VPN is an interface, much like an Ethernet port is an interface. You can apply QoS to an interface. -Original Message- From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:mikrotik- boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Dylan

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100401/078d8ce8/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

and Administration Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100401/078d8ce8/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

(765) 855-1060 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100401/078d8ce 8/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100401/078d8ce 8/attachment.html

[Mikrotik] Blocking UDP traffic

While working on our bandwidth monitoring system, we noticed a lot of strange traffic that had no apparent route through our system, but was coming across the wire between our core router and our NAT router. The traffic would be destined for addresses like '192.168.0.10', '192.168.4.5' and

Re: [Mikrotik] Blocking UDP traffic

We don't route any RFC 1918 IP space anywhere on our network and we null route all 3 blocks at our borders. Haven't seen this issue but I haven't put a sniffer in at a tower to see if it's leaking out anywhere either. Interesting scenario. Dylan On Apr 1, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists

Re: [Mikrotik] Blocking UDP traffic

I see totally out of network IPs in hotspot (Mikrotik) quite often. Hotels and on one small network at the office. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100401/078d8ce 8/attachment.html

Re: [Mikrotik] model recommendation for WAN failover/load balance/MPLS

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:37 -0400, Dylan Bouterse wrote: So all traffic in the VPN is prioritized equally? In that case a file transfer between locations could effect VOIP. I guess the only other option is to have the VOIP outside the VPN if that's even feasable...assuming there is no