Re: [Mikrotik] Simple script does not run

And make sure that you understand what you are doing. Because 'print' command is for interactive execution, indices can change: [admin@TestPlace] > interface print where fast-path=yes Flags: D - dynamic, X - disabled, R - running, S - slave # NAMETYPE

Re: [Mikrotik] Leap Second

AFAIR, they at least fixed CCR crash on leap second =) 10 Ноя 2016 г. 19:32 пользователь "Matthew Brendle" < mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com> написал: > Did Mikrotik get their Leap Second issue straightened out? I think last > time a leap second was added, ROS had an issue if it was set as

Re: [Mikrotik] Filtering unwanted VLAN tags on WLAN

Maybe just use Bridge Filter to drop unnecessary directions? :) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2016-10-24 10:45 GMT+03:00 Benoit Panizzon : > Hi all > > I have this set-up on a 5Hac > > LAN1: Default (untagged) LAN: 192.168.1.0/24 > LAN1 VLAN

Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing help

That's how it works :) Add a rule on top: /ip fi man add chain=prerouting dst-address=your_local_subnet action=accept Where your_local_subnet can be something like 192.168.0.0/16 (I doubt you need to reach those addresses via WAN :)) 22 Июн 2016 г. 6:00 PM пользователь "Ty Featherling" <

Re: [Mikrotik] Script to monitor ethernet interface speed

Check $"myvar-for-$interface" syntax 8 Мар 2016 г. 0:09 пользователь "Christopher Tyler" < ch...@totalhighspeed.net> написал: > The problem isn't getting the info that I need or even storing it in a > variable. If I write the script and do one interface per line, this becomes > trivial as each

Re: [Mikrotik] How to set an interface queue to a specific size?

Huh?.. The screenshot is from v6.31 on CCR.​ -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2015-09-15 19:59 GMT+03:00 Mike Lyon : > Yeah, that's what I thought. But there doesn't seem to be a pull-down to > select an interface, like I am used to on my old

Re: [Mikrotik] Traffic generator

Have you checked http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Performance_Testing_with_Traffic_Generator ? -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2015-09-04 21:38 GMT+03:00 Ty Featherling : > How the heck do I use this thing? I just want to do a bandwidth test.

Re: [Mikrotik] DHCP Option 1

What ROS version? AFAIR, standard options cannot be overridden with 'custom' ones, you should set them in appropriate fields in 'Networks' 31 Авг 2015 г. 22:43 пользователь "Roy, Jerry" написал: > All, > > Have an odd one. Laptop obtains an IP address with subnet

Re: [Mikrotik] Selective NAT

Seems like that's not the only NAT rule you have, because that rule masquerades only 10.0.1.0/24 :) Anyway, I prefer using scheme like /ip firewall nat add action=accept chain=srcnat out-interface=WAN src-address=209.90.234.1/28 add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface=WAN I.e. accept

Re: [Mikrotik] [Mikrotik Users] Selective NAT

disabled=yes huh?.. 4 Июл 2015 г. 2:04 пользователь D. Ryan Spott rsp...@ngc457.com написал: This might help: A diagram The export of the config: ... /interface bridge port add bridge=LAN interface=ether2 add bridge=LAN interface=ether3 add bridge=LAN interface=ether4 add

Re: [Mikrotik] Cloud Core High Cpu with low traffic load

bar. Does that count all the cores? On May 12, 2015 1:47:23 AM AST, Chupaka chup...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. You mean, 99% of all cores? What was in Tools - Profile? I have 99% on single core usually, utilized by 'management'. 11 Май 2015 г. 16:52 пользователь Keith Barber ke

Re: [Mikrotik] Cloud Core High Cpu with low traffic load

Hello. You mean, 99% of all cores? What was in Tools - Profile? I have 99% on single core usually, utilized by 'management'. 11 Май 2015 г. 16:52 пользователь Keith Barber ke...@reliablevi.com написал: Good morning everybody, Got a strange issue. CCR1016-12G running one of our smaller

Re: [Mikrotik] Running out of HD

Check instaled packages, for example. Remove unnecessary ones. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2015-03-30 19:29 GMT+03:00 John Babineaux j...@rcsaccess.com: I am having a problem with a few of my Mikrotiks on my network. I was checking backups and realized that I was

Re: [Mikrotik] traffic flow FW rule

What's the question?.. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2015-03-05 19:54 GMT+03:00 Roy, Jerry jerry@toltsolutions.com: All, I keep getting unreplied for my fw rule for traffic flow between two IP's Any Ideas why? /ip firewall filter add action=accept

Re: [Mikrotik] traffic flow FW rule

Yep, without second 'add' (and I'd remove 'src-address' - it's not necessary here) it allows NetFlow packets from that router to the collector on 216.231.x.x:2055. 2015-03-06 0:30 GMT+03:00 Roy, Jerry jerry@toltsolutions.com: From the WAN on this MT to the WAN of the device that is

Re: [Mikrotik] MT export problems

, Chupaka chup...@gmail.com wrote: So, what's incorrect in that behaviour?.. Are you looking for '/export verbose'? 06 янв. 2015 г. 4:34 пользователь Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com написал: I have a 6.23 rb2011ils where every /export or /export compact file=filename ends up

Re: [Mikrotik] MT export problems

So, what's incorrect in that behaviour?.. Are you looking for '/export verbose'? 06 янв. 2015 г. 4:34 пользователь Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com написал: I have a 6.23 rb2011ils where every /export or /export compact file=filename ends up at 5.4 kilobytes and it stops at the /tool

Re: [Mikrotik] DNS Firewall

Why do you need to block it in input chain? Forward is quite enough. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2014-08-06 18:32 GMT+03:00 Mike Hammett butch-mikro...@ics-il.net: Would this be a good DNS ruleset? Assuming I put my DNS servers in the DNS_Servers address list.

Re: [Mikrotik] DNS Firewall

://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 11:56:06 AM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] DNS Firewall Why do you need to block it in input chain? Forward is quite enough

Re: [Mikrotik] Traffic Generator

IP-SLA is rather NetWatch (or BFD). Traffic Generator is kind of bandwidth/quality tester. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2014-04-15 17:53 GMT+03:00 Mike Hammett butch-mikro...@ics-il.net: What do we know about MT's Traffic Generator feature? It seems similar to

Re: [Mikrotik] VLAN setup

you don't need bridgeTRUNK for your described task. but it should work also with your config /interface bridge add l2mtu=1590 name=bridgeACCESS-50 add name=bridgeACCESS-51 /interface vlan add interface=sfp1 l2mtu=65531 name=vlan50 vlan-id=50 add interface=sfp1 l2mtu=65531 name=vlan51 vlan-id=51

Re: [Mikrotik] cpu spikes on Mikrotik router

Look at the Profiler when problem appears. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2014-02-04 Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com: What the hell is this madness? This is an RB450G as a tower router with backhaul in ether1 and the rest of the ports bridged. A handful of

Re: [Mikrotik] cpu spikes on Mikrotik router

SNMP? -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2014-02-04 Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com: Looks like the Management profile is consuming the cycles. What could that be? -Ty On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I just

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridge Ports showing with an S on version 6.7

It's as it should be. 'Slave' interfaces are not only hardware switches, but also bridge or bonding ports. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2014-02-03 Paul McCall pa...@pdmnet.net: First time using 6.x. running it on a Cloud Switch router I created a bridge for all

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridge Ports showing with an S on version 6.7

Just to know that interface is not independent one ;) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2014-02-03 Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com: Yeah but why? Some updated functionality of bridge involving the switch chip? -Ty On Feb 3, 2014 11:24 AM, Justin Miller

Re: [Mikrotik] DHCP server + Firewall

Afair, DHCP uses something like RAW_SOCKET or even more low-level functions, so the only way to catch its packets is to create a bridge (with a single port - necessary interface) and use bridge filter (or enable 'use-ip-firewall'). -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем)

Re: [Mikrotik] Firewall Rule

Sure it is normal. According to Packet Flow diagram ( http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Packet_Flow), Dst-NAT is before Filter Forward, that's why you're observing already NATted IPs in Firewall Filter. -- 2013/12/17 Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com Okay, so I spoke too soon. The rule still

Re: [Mikrotik] Bandwith guarenty

but you're talking about traffic limitation, or both limitation/Reservation? thank Tayeb Meftah Voice of the blind T Broadcast Freedom http://www.vobradio.org Phone:447559762242 - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik

Re: [Mikrotik] Bandwith guarenty

64kbps for the whole subnet in summary, or per IP? -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2013/9/5 Tayeb Meftah tayeb.mef...@gmail.com Hey Guys, how to guarenty bandwidth for some subnet? for example, i have 192.168.10.0/24 i want it to always ensure 64kbit/s upload, but if

Re: [Mikrotik] Bandwith guarenty

Tayeb Meftah tayeb.mef...@gmail.com it's a /24 but have only a single ip active, so let's try it per ip Tayeb Meftah Voice of the blind T Broadcast Freedom http://www.vobradio.org Phone:447559762242 - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions

Re: [Mikrotik] Multiple DHCP Scopes on same interface

Two pools - no, because you don't have a way to distinguish them. You may use a pool for all clients and then add static leases from another subnet for 'special cases'. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2013/9/4 Lanham Rattan lan...@rattan.net Can I have to pools of

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik BUG !!

-and-6-sshd-remote-preauth-** heap-corruption/http://kingcope.wordpress.com/2013/09/02/mikrotik-routeros-5-and-6-sshd-remote-preauth-heap-corruption/ On 03/09/2013 19:13, Chupaka wrote: Haha, not creating '/etc/devel-login' makes this issue non-existent :D -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP Community

Then you add some community to that announce, and on other routers you create routing filter that will change that route to blackhole/unreachable, like /routing filters add chain=announce-in bgp-communities=65332:888 action=accept set-type=unreachable, or set-routing-mark=fullbogon, or whatever

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP Community

http://www.vobradio.org Phone:447559762242 - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 2:01 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] BGP Community Then you add some community to that announce

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP Community

it as fullbogon 217.0.0.0/8 and assigned it to bgp community 65000:888 but i dont see the bgp chain in the routing filter? :) Tayeb Meftah Voice of the blind T Broadcast Freedom http://www.vobradio.org Phone:447559762242 - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP Community

community 65000:888 but i dont see the bgp chain in the routing filter? :) Tayeb Meftah Voice of the blind T Broadcast Freedom http://www.vobradio.org Phone:447559762242 - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik BUG !!

The password from 'admin'. It's old known 'feature' =) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2013/9/4 Jerry Roy j...@ipass.com I have tried and it keeps saying wrong password. What are you using for password? *Jerry Roy* Sr. Systems Engineer MTCNA/MTCRE/MTCTCE 1 949

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik BUG !!

Haha, not creating '/etc/devel-login' makes this issue non-existent :D -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2013/9/4 Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com On 09/03/2013 04:55 PM, Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) wrote: Anyone has more infos about mikrotik ssh bug ?? A properly

Re: [Mikrotik] IPV6-PD Over PPP

://www.vobradio.org Phone:447559762242 - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:36 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPV6-PD Over PPP Everything is correct: DHCP server is not used

Re: [Mikrotik] Powerrouter 732 - choice of storage

SSD? =) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2013/5/23 Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com CompactFlash. No moving parts. Why get a mechanical disk? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, May

Re: [Mikrotik] uRFP/BCP38? (Anti-Spoofing)

It's from v6, by the way :) 2013/4/17 Chupaka chup...@gmail.com uRPF looks like /ip settings set rp-filter= -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2013/4/17 Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com Just wondering if MT has implemented anything automatic, or if you still

Re: [Mikrotik] Multicast (IGMP/PIM) over GRE Tunnel?

Do you have an IP address on that interface? -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2013/4/12 Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch Yo! I try go get pim / igmp working over a GRE tunnel, so that some service discovery features that use Multicast work. But as soon as I

Re: [Mikrotik] Multicast (IGMP/PIM) over GRE Tunnel?

I mean, not the address on your WAN interface, but address on your GRE interface: /ip ad ad interface=GRE -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2013/4/12 Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch Am Friday, 12. April 2013, 15.30:07 schrieb Chupaka: Do you have an IP address

Re: [Mikrotik] 1:1 NAT strangeness

2013/1/22 Craig Baird cr...@xpressweb.com Looks like the MT documentation needs to be revised... Links, links! :) -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20130122/c1c22097/attachment.html

Re: [Mikrotik] many to many NAT

Yep, 1:1 is with action=netmap. 2013/1/18 Paolo Di Francesco paolo.difrance...@level7.it It sounds like you could also apply a 1:1 NAT Regards Paolo We are replacing a cisco router that is doing many to many nat. From the looks of it, it's taking a public network /24 and natting to a

Re: [Mikrotik] Probm in FTP File Zilla Software.

: Chupaka Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 4:48 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Probm in FTP File Zilla Software. Change it to both-addresses or src-address - and it should work. 2012/12/21 Talha Ahmed talha...@hotmail.com both-addresses-and-ports -- next part

Re: [Mikrotik] Probm in FTP File Zilla Software.

What classifier do you use for PCC? -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/12/21 Talha Ahmed talha...@hotmail.com Sir I am using RB 750 GL. I have install two ISP in the device and I am using PCC method for load balancing. All the Things are running perfectly

Re: [Mikrotik] PPTP VPN Error 619

Have you checked Windows Firewall? -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/12/20 Tayeb Meftah tayeb.mef...@gmail.com MT is in Public, Nat is in client side. i think i'lle give up and get OpenVPN. - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com

Re: [Mikrotik] Probm in FTP File Zilla Software.

Change it to both-addresses or src-address - and it should work. 2012/12/21 Talha Ahmed talha...@hotmail.com both-addresses-and-ports -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Re: [Mikrotik] Probm in FTP File Zilla Software.

In your rules, replace per-connection-classifier=**both-addresses-and-ports with per-connection-classifier=**both-addresses. 2012/12/21 Talha Ahmed talha...@hotmail.com Can you explain it more. Or please write down the script for me. Please please -Original Message- From: Chupaka

Re: [Mikrotik] PPTP VPN Error 619

Any NAT/Filter on the road? Seems like GRE protocol cannot pass to your PPTP server. If not (seems like it's WinXP) - go to Control Panel, open Windows Firewall - won't there be any errors while opening it? -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/12/20 Tayeb Meftah

Re: [Mikrotik] PPTP VPN Error 619

...@gmail.com yes, there's nat is gre required? - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:52 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] PPTP VPN Error 619 Any NAT/Filter on the road? Seems like GRE protocol

Re: [Mikrotik] Multiple IP Adresses to one interface = No route to host

Hmmm... As soon as my posts on the forum are replied, I get an e-mail, where one click is enough to get to the reply. What am I doing wrong? :) 2012/12/10 Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch I also asked my question on the forum in the mean time. But I prefer Mailinglists, where I get

Re: [Mikrotik] Multiple IP Adresses to one interface = No route to host

Just a note for sidewalkers: forum is not an official support channel :) 2012/12/7 Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 09:44 +0100, Benoit Panizzon wrote: I fear I stumbled over a routerOS bug. Could somebody confirm or does someone know a work-around? (Is this the

Re: [Mikrotik] ip trafficflow

Now run torch on ether1 you get 1/2 the traffic - ?.. Why?.. I see all the traffic in Torch %) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/11/13 jerryallen...@vistabeam.com Does the Mikrotik traffic-flow / netflow correctly implement netflow? Reason I ask is there seems to

Re: [Mikrotik] ip trafficflow

and another for src/dst. The send and receive columns show the traffic going the respective direction. I have not done enough with netflow to know that it operates correctly. On 11/13/2012 6:57 AM, Chupaka wrote: Now run torch on ether1 you get 1/2 the traffic - ?.. Why?.. I see all the traffic

Re: [Mikrotik] Opening console on serial port rb411

Try 115200?.. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/11/9 Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com Is this 9600 8n1 with no flow control? As soon as you plug in the power I get the 4 green LEDs and the blue light comes on. I don't see anything at all. It does power

Re: [Mikrotik] PPPoE Server

You can limit the number of PPPoE active clients by downgrading your license to Level 5 %) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/11/8 Martin Bérard mber...@groupesdp.com Hi all, This is my first try in this mailing-list. We have been using RB1100 to a specific task

Re: [Mikrotik] find host behind port

On /ip arp, all addresses will be on the bridge. Try /interface bridge host print 2012/10/24 Casey Mills wkm...@gmail.com /ip arp print Casey On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: On a Cisco switch I use the command show mac-address-table

Re: [Mikrotik] find host behind port

/interface bridge host print where mac-address=00-0b-1a-b1-ab-1a or something like that :) 2012/10/24 Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com That gave me the list, is there a way to enter a search term? -Ty On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Chupaka chup...@gmail.com wrote: On /ip arp

Re: [Mikrotik] Identifying high Packets Per Second connections

Torch is manual tool. For some automation look at 'dst-limit' firewall matcher. 2012/10/16 Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com TORCH! Why did I forget torch? Thanks Josh! -Ty On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote: Torch would be super easy...

Re: [Mikrotik] IPS lines for financial institutions

add action=log chain=IPS limit=10,5 log-prefix=ping_flood: protocol=icmp This will log any ICMP upto 10 packets per second, not more - I don't think it's what you need. 2012/9/13 Jacob Heider jhhei...@gmail.com Soon, I will be installing a routerboard (probably a 2011) for a bank as their

Re: [Mikrotik] Odd

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=98190#p98190 2012/8/30 Bill Prince part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com We had an RB493 do something almost identical. Been quite a while, but I do recall it also having 400+ days on the odometer. It was like it had rebooted, but hadn't at the same

Re: [Mikrotik] Odd

/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS Chupaka mailto:chup...@gmail.com August 30, 2012 3:06 http://forum.mikrotik.com/**viewtopic.php?p=98190#p98190http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=98190#p98190 2012/8/30 Bill Prince part-15@**skylinebroadbandservice.compart

Re: [Mikrotik] Queue for packets marked AF31

Create different queues and mark based on DSCP =) AF31 is DSCP=26 2012/8/7 Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com Not want I am wanting to accomplish. On a customer's router I see VoIP and VPN traffic. They want VoIP prioritized. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct:

Re: [Mikrotik] Wierd Arp behavior RB433AH v5.8

Isn't Proxy-ARP enabled on ether1?.. %) 2012/8/8 Kevin Sullivan kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net So, I have a RB433AH running version 5.8. It has a natted subnet behind it, 10.10.0.1/16. This IP pool is on ether3. However, it replies on ether1, with, 10.10.0.1 is-at mac address of ether3. Which

Re: [Mikrotik] IPROUTE2 multiple GW

Well, if translate word-by-word, then it should be something like: /ip route add routing-mark=adsl dst-address=80.90.100.88/29 gateway=eth0 /ip route add routing-mark=adsl dst-address=192.168.200.0/24 gateway=eth1 /ip route add routing-mark=adsl dst-address=90.100.120.150/29 gateway=eth2 /ip

Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem

/ip fi man add chain=prerouting dst-address=172.16.0.0/12 action=accept place-before=0 -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server.

Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem

show traceroute from one subnet to another one -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com done it but still no effect :( thank you - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik

Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem

...@gmail.com traceroute from 172.16.101.254 to 172.16.100.2 show only 172.16.100.1 and then only * - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik, IPSec VPN, UDP, VOIP

Sure, any IP traffic inside any tunnel. 2012/7/13 Damai damai7...@yahoo.com.sg Oh, it is my mistake, it is OpenVPN that does not support UDP mode. So, if we are using OpenVPN, we can still using UDP/VOIP inside the tunnel? Thanks. Anto Chupaka wrote: Please give us a link. OpenVPN

Re: [Mikrotik] Advice

Huh... The suggestion is to use PCQ queues in Queue Tree instead of Simple Queues :) P.S. What version of RouterOS do you use? 2012/7/12 Derek Whitford de...@dataflys.com We are looking to upgrade some of our routers and need advice on which to get. We are currently using RB750G's at these

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik, IPSec VPN, UDP, VOIP

Please give us a link. OpenVPN in RouterOS does not support UDP mode. I haven't heard about any such limitations in IPSec. And definitely it should not affect traffic inside the tunnel, so VoIP will work. 2012/7/9 Damai damai7...@yahoo.com.sg Hi All, I've read that IPSec VPN in Mikrotik does

Re: [Mikrotik] NAT - Masquarade

through a log ..etc on the Tik? thanks guys..I hope I am making this clear.. I appreciate all responses. Kenny On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Chupaka chup...@gmail.com wrote: Masquerade uses single address, not pool :) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем

Re: [Mikrotik] Source based routing

What's problem with NAT?.. Routing is before src-nat... /ip route add routing-mark=gw1 gateway=1.1.1.1 /ip route add routing-mark=gw2 gateway=2.2.2.2 /ip route rule add src-address=111.0.0.0/8 action=lookup table=gw1 /ip route rule add src-address=222.0.0.0/8 action=lookup table=gw2 2012/6/5

Re: [Mikrotik] trouble accessing a routerboard

Use MAC Telnet / MAC Winbox?.. 2012/6/5 Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com I have an RB running 2.9.24 (it's an old one). It is only functioning as a DHCP server currently. I have a management ip of 10.0.4.3/22 on it with a gateway of 10.0.4.1. I also have one address for each network

Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP

: but...@butchevans.com To: mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:35:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 10:27 +0300, Chupaka wrote: Why do you mark connection if you need routing

Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP

. From: but...@butchevans.com To: mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:35:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 10:27 +0300, Chupaka wrote: Why do you mark connection if you need

Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP

@mail.butchevans.com Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:35:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 10:27 +0300, Chupaka wrote: Why do you mark connection if you need routing? Just mark routing directly

Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP

, 2012-05-26 at 10:27 +0300, Chupaka wrote: Why do you mark connection if you need routing? Just mark routing directly :) This would work if you only need to route ONE DIRECTION for the traffic. In other words, inside traffic going toward the internet via a specific upstream. Downstream

Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP

2012 11:35:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 10:27 +0300, Chupaka wrote: Why do you mark connection if you need routing? Just mark routing directly :) This would work if you only need to route ONE DIRECTION

Re: [Mikrotik] Policy routing based on DSCP

Why do you mark connection if you need routing? Just mark routing directly :) 2012/5/26 William Esteves stevens...@hotmail.com Hello, I want to know if I can do routing based on DSCP (tos mark), I did it by marking connection with connection-mark, but the connection seens like didnt work.

Re: [Mikrotik] NAT - Masquarade

Masquerade uses single address, not pool :) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/5/17 Kenny Kant akennyk...@gmail.com We have recently implemented a large PAT/Masquerade for our customers. How can one monitor the nat pool for exhaustion? Thanks gang!

Re: [Mikrotik] VPLS Control Word

In Windows, you set data payload size for ping, and header is 28 bytes long. So ping -l 1472 creates packets with length = 1472 + 28 = 1500 bytes. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/4/6 butch-mikro...@ics-il.net As I understood it, VPLS Control Word would fragment an

Re: [Mikrotik] VPLS Control Word

only do 1486 now, which is 1518 - 28 - 4. - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Friday, April 6, 2012 6:19:50 AM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] VPLS Control Word In Windows, you set data payload size for ping

Re: [Mikrotik] Redirecting marked traffic

Add a rule to Bridge NAT with src-mac-address=your_MAC and action=redirect - after that, the traffic should be processed by the routing facility, not by bridge. 2012/3/28 Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net Anyone know of a way to redirect marked traffic? Specifically I am working on a bridged

Re: [Mikrotik] PL MUM

I'm out - Polish consulate has a queue upto March, 26th... I can't get visa before the MUM :( 2012/2/20 Chupaka chup...@gmail.com I'm collecting docs for Visa - hope I'll be there on MUM, as always :) 2012/2/20 Martin Ruiz Ibersystems martinr...@ibersystems.es Hello, who is going

Re: [Mikrotik] PL MUM

* * * 2012/2/29 Chupaka chup...@gmail.com I'm out - Polish consulate has a queue upto March, 26th... I can't get visa before the MUM :( 2012/2/20 Chupaka chup...@gmail.com I'm collecting docs for Visa - hope I'll be there on MUM, as always :) 2012/2/20 Martin Ruiz

Re: [Mikrotik] Connection Limit question...

Also, take a look at this topic: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2t=54607 2012/2/15 Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com We've had a customer getting DDoS'd on his colocation server, which my usually resolution has been to route to Null0. The DDoS wasn't huge, so I'm thinking I

Re: [Mikrotik] VPN tunnel with minimal CPU requirement

Seems like IP Tunnel (ipip) has the smallest overhead (20 bytes per packet) - I'd rather use it :) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/1/8 Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com On what hardware, Dave? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343

Re: [Mikrotik] Bonding

Simple queues work on LAN side, PCC works on WAN side of router. Should not be an issue. 2011/12/31 Scott Kress sc...@kressintegrated.com Once PCC is setup, how does this effect simple queue? Are there any issues with moving from a simple queue list on a single upstream to a PCC setup?

Re: [Mikrotik] Seriously

Isn't it as wireless works?.. Can wifi hosts see each other directly, in p2p manner? I doubt :) -- Sent from my PC in drunk state %) 2011/12/23 Stuart Pierce spie...@avolve.net I'm dense. Why is it a cpe in router mode authenticated to a Tik hotspot will have other ip addresses in the

Re: [Mikrotik] Bonding

As it was said in some Europe MUM presentation, in case of several uplinks, 1+1 is not equal to 2. So you can't split one stream to both Internet connections. But 1+1 is equal to 1/2+1/2+1/2+1/2 - you can get many small streams and balance the load among your Internet connections. 2011/12/22

Re: [Mikrotik] MUM Europe 2012

Poland again? %( 2011/12/12 Martín Ruiz Ibersystems martinr...@ibersystems.es Normunds said it in private forum.. But not confirmed in main forum. I think they wan to confirm trainings before, to give us allthe info at the same time. This year, they are doing this too slowly. Martín Ruiz

Re: [Mikrotik] Repeating the signal in a building

Maybe, some copper?.. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2011/11/30 Martin Ruiz Ibersystems martinr...@ibersystems.es Hello, I have to move 2 Mbps from 4th floor to floor -1, using 411AR and 2.4GHz frequency. I'm planning to configure many repeaters (1 x floor), but

Re: [Mikrotik] WinBox version

Just a note: 2.2.18 is version of WinBox Loader. WinBox is downloaded from the router on connect, so we can say that WinBox has the same version as RouterOS :) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2011/10/27 Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com I have seen 1 difference

Re: [Mikrotik] DHCP Options

I doubt you can use Option 118 at al. Option82 is usable only when working with RADIUS. -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2011/10/5 Justin Miller mikro...@dynstatic.net I'm trying to set up a CMTS to use DHCP Relay for CPE and cable modem devices pointing towards a

Re: [Mikrotik] RB1000 L2MTU

Is L2MTU changeable?.. Or you mean just MTU?.. If no tunnels are used, 1500 is good MTU 2011/9/24 RickG rgunder...@gmail.com OK, what are you guys setting the L2MTU to? I've got a fairly simple network: Fiber to RB100 to main tower AP's bridged to remote tower stations bridged to remote

Re: [Mikrotik] IP passthrough; can you do this?

I was using this unnumbered way in v3, I believe... Or maybe 2.9... Years ago :) 2011/9/22 Kristian Hoffmann kh...@fire2wire.com I forgot to mention that I'm pretty sure adding unnumbered addresses in this way is only supported supported in ROS 5.x. -Kristian

Re: [Mikrotik] snmp and bgp

Changelog for v5 contains a few snmp vs routing table entries - maybe the problem was fixed in v5? =) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2011/8/9 Kristian Hoffmann kh...@fire2wire.com Walking the routing table via SNMP on a MikroTik with many routes seems to be a bad

  1   2   >