Re: [Mikrotik] Push routes to PPTP VPN Client

Nov 9, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Damai wrote: Hello All, :) I'm setting PPTP VPN Server on RB-750. Everything is okay, client/Windows can connect to this server. When Client connect to the server, they will automatically get additional routing path 0.0.0.0/0 pointing to the VPN Server. This

[Mikrotik] Push routes to PPTP VPN Client

Hello All, :) I'm setting PPTP VPN Server on RB-750. Everything is okay, client/Windows can connect to this server. When Client connect to the server, they will automatically get additional routing path 0.0.0.0/0 pointing to the VPN Server. This will cause all the internet traffic will go thru t

[Mikrotik] Multiple AP with same SSID

Dear All, The situation is something like this: There is a big house, it seems one access point would not cover all the area. So we plan to install two or more access point. All these APs linked with UTP cables. So when the UserA is in RoomA, connecting to AP-A, it get full signal from AP-A. T

Re: [Mikrotik] strange traceroute?

Tim Warnock wrote: -Original Message- From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:mikrotik- boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Damai Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2012 1:18 AM To: mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Subject: [Mikrotik] strange traceroute? But when routing out from

[Mikrotik] strange traceroute?

Hi All, I have one main mikrotik router, connect to 4 router which each of them connected to a cable modem. All from one same ISP. For any IP/network range, I can select to going out from which cable modem. So one time my computer going out to internet from ModemA, tomorrow from ModemB, etc,

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik, IPSec VPN, UDP, VOIP

IPSec. And definitely it should not affect traffic inside the tunnel, so VoIP will work. 2012/7/9 Damai Hi All, I've read that IPSec VPN in Mikrotik does not support UDP. So if we established the IPSec VPN connection with Mikrotik at any end, then we cannot do VOIP thru the tunnel, rig

[Mikrotik] Mikrotik, IPSec VPN, UDP, VOIP

Hi All, I've read that IPSec VPN in Mikrotik does not support UDP. So if we established the IPSec VPN connection with Mikrotik at any end, then we cannot do VOIP thru the tunnel, right? Please confirm. We are going to make IPSec connection between Mikrotik RB1100AH and Sonicwall. Thanks. Ant

[Mikrotik] rb1200 port configuration

Dear All, I just got a RB1200 with 10 gbit ports. I usually use RB750 with 5 ports. In RB750, we can configure each port, slave/master and queue. In RB1200, it seems we can only configure slave/master and queue for the first 5 port/group1. What can we do with the next 5 port (port 6 - 10) in

Re: [Mikrotik] Give public IP to clients

Yusuf Sengeza wrote: Hi, Now some of my clients have IP cameras with DVRs that they would like to access remotely. I have been told they need public IPs into their routers. One has to access his Webbox for configuring solar system remotely. I dont know how am going to implement this though I

Re: [Mikrotik] multiple gateway to 1 destination ip

Butch Evans wrote: You can use the Nth approach (older method) or the PCC (newer method). Both are documented in the wiki. Without further information, it's hard to tell what you are trying that is not working. Hi, Perhaps you could use the old style way to make load balancing... NTH. T

[Mikrotik] multiple gateway to 1 destination ip

Hi All, :) Assume we have several gateway to internet. Our email server is sending email to another SMTP server (with one static public IP). Currently, we route all traffic from our email server to one gateway. But it seems the upload bandwidth is not big enought to handle the outgoing email.

Re: [Mikrotik] torch, can we see destination domain name

r in the packet. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Scott Reed wrote: I don't know in torch. On a PC, nslookup ipaddress will return the name On *nix, dig -x ipaddress On 11/3/2010 2:55 PM, D

[Mikrotik] torch, can we see destination domain name

Hi All, :) From the queue table, we can see one user is consuming a lot of bandwidth. Using Torch, we can find out the destination IP, but we cannot see the destination domain name/website. Is there anyway to display the destination domain name/website in Torch? Or anyway to find out the exac

Re: [Mikrotik] remove unused routing mark name

route rule pr Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Damai wrote: Sorry, telnet into the mikrotik, typing: /ip route policy pr, bad command name policy btw, I'm using RB750 version 4.9. th

Re: [Mikrotik] remove unused routing mark name

Sorry, telnet into the mikrotik, typing: /ip route policy pr, bad command name policy btw, I'm using RB750 version 4.9. thanks. anto Josh Luthman wrote: Ip route policy pr On Oct 9, 2010 9:07 PM, "Damai" wrote: hello there, i have several unused routing mark name. so wh

[Mikrotik] remove unused routing mark name

hello there, i have several unused routing mark name. so when i login into winbox, ip, route, rule, action=lookup, table... there is so many table there. is there anyway to delete unused routing mark/routing table name? thanks. anto ___ Mikrotik mail

Re: [Mikrotik] oot: internet sharing at bridge side, not AP site

y, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Damai wrote: I have a PC plugged into an AP (not MT, but Engenius EOC-2610 in AP mode), and at the other end, there are EOC-2610 in Client Bridge mode, connecting to MT serving NAT/gateway to internet. Haven't tried the DHCP and WDS tes

Re: [Mikrotik] oot: internet sharing at bridge side, not AP site

g 26, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Damai wrote: Yes, both site are using the same subnet, because it is using Client Bridge Mode, not using Client Router mode, am I wrong? Both side can communicate properly, any PC at side A can ping/access any PC at site B, and vice versa. The only problem is the PC at s

Re: [Mikrotik] oot: internet sharing at bridge side, not AP site

u, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Damai wrote: Hi All, To share internet connection between 2 building wirelessly, I always use this topology: internet-simple nat router-wireless(AP mode) ~~~ wireless(Client Bridge mode)-user pc using the above topology, user can connect to the internet properly. B

[Mikrotik] oot: internet sharing at bridge side, not AP site

Hi All, To share internet connection between 2 building wirelessly, I always use this topology: internet-simple nat router-wireless(AP mode) ~~~ wireless(Client Bridge mode)-user pc using the above topology, user can connect to the internet properly. But sometimes we need to use this topology

Re: [Mikrotik] VPN Client IP and netbios name

usually need a domain controller. Bill Prince Skyline Broadband Service (a division of Coastal Sierra, Inc.) Phone:650-917-9279 On 2/23/2010 10:49 PM, Damai wrote: Hello All, I'm going to replace a windows VPN server with a mikrotik. Current system: Office A, IP=192.168.0.0/24 D

[Mikrotik] VPN Client IP and netbios name

Hello All, I'm going to replace a windows VPN server with a mikrotik. Current system: Office A, IP=192.168.0.0/24 Domain Server+DHCP Server = Win2003 Server = 192.168.0.11 VPN Server = win2003 Server 192.168.0.180 Internet connection is using ADSL line. Remote user, using WinXP, dial to VPN Se

Re: [Mikrotik] script to check email for dns updating

Okay, problem solved. Thanks a lot everybody! I register a free changeip account, install the changeip script into mikrotik, and point the previous dynamic dns to this changeip account with CNAME. One more thing :) Because the mikrotik is connected to a ADSL router, the mikrotik is setup usin

[Mikrotik] script to check email for dns updating

Hello All, :) I have a subdomain which I use to update my IP (something like dyndns). To update my public IP, I have to check/pop a certain mailbox using pop3 protocol. I can do this manually, telnet into the mikrotik, then run /system telnet ip-number 8110 after connected to the server, then