11 2:17 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: [Mikrotik] Fwd: RouterOS v5.0 released
Does anyone think this is honestly worth trusting as a non-RC release?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
-- Forwarded message --
From: MikroTik
ut I
> >> always
> >> > do a lab RB first.
> >> >
> >> > Chadd
> >> >
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
> >> > [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butche
, April 03, 2011 3:01 AM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Fwd: RouterOS v5.0 released
Any experimented with any mipsbe? 750?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Chadd Thompson wrote
een bad if this was a remote upgrade but I
>> always
>> > do a lab RB first.
>> >
>> > Chadd
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
>> > [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] O
gt; > [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:17 PM
> > To: Mikrotik discussions
> > Subject: [Mikrotik] Fwd: RouterOS v5.0 released
> >
> > Does anyone think this is honestl
essage-
> From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
> [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:17 PM
> To: Mikrotik discussions
> Subject: [Mikrotik] Fwd: RouterOS v5.0 released
>
> Does anyone think this is honestl
a lab RB first.
Chadd
-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
[mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:17 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: [Mikrotik] Fwd: RouterOS v5.0 released
Does anyone think
x86 and RouterBoard products... RB/1000 and RB/493G specifically
Regards,
Chuck
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Tristram Cheer
wrote:
> As always with MT it's what's fixed but not in the changelog that defines
> how stable a release is going to be. ROS releases always seem to only
> become
> r
As always with MT it's what's fixed but not in the changelog that defines
how stable a release is going to be. ROS releases always seem to only become
really stable after x.5 to x.8 releases
So far so good, But we haven't tried it on a wireless link yet.
On 1 April 2011 09:10, Chuck Hogg wrote:
Both of you running on x86?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
> +1
> Regards,
>
> Chuck
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
>
> > We are running RC9 and RC1
+1
Regards,
Chuck
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> We are running RC9 and RC10 on 6 or 7 production routers. No issues.
>
> Travis
>
>
>
> On 3/31/2011 1:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>> Does anyone think this is honestly worth trusting as a non-RC release?
>>
>> Josh Lu
We are running RC9 and RC10 on 6 or 7 production routers. No issues.
Travis
On 3/31/2011 1:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Does anyone think this is honestly worth trusting as a non-RC release?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
---
Does anyone think this is honestly worth trusting as a non-RC release?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
-- Forwarded message --
From: MikroTik
Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM
Subject: RouterOS v5.0 released
To: j..
13 matches
Mail list logo
