Howdy,
This problem would sound like it's a rather trivial problem but I am
banging my head into the wall trying to figure it out. Layout is this:
NOCUBNT Rocket M5 Station WDS bridge mode---MK RB493AH---UBNT
Rocket M2 AP WDS bridge mode
The MK is routing between two /24s. I can ping the
Not sure on the network diagram as to whether the Rocket's are ethernet
connected to the 493 or if it is a wireless connection. If ethernet,
open web interface on the rocket, start a ping on the 493 and when it
drops packets check that status of the LAN to see if it still thinks it
is
Sorry about that.
Yes, ether cable between the rockets and the MK. Good idea on the web
browser, will check that. Though, I didn't see any link drops in either of
the logs on the Rocket or the MK.
Thanks,
Mike
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net wrote:
Not sure
Pinging from MikroTik to UBNT devices, set the delay to 100ms, let it go a
few hundred, do you drop packets?
If so you have the known incompatibility problem between UBNT/MikroTik.
The only remedy I have seen is to put something mid-span, but that doesn't
work that great. Or replace the UBNT
Well, that makes it even more weird...
Pinged as suggested from the MK to the UBNT device with the 100ms timeout.
Ran clean without one dropped packet for 2000 pings. Had the other window
open pinging the MK, no dropped packets there either. Stopped the ping from
the MK to the UBNT device, but
You set a default route on the MT back to the NOC, but what about from
the NOC to the MT is that static or OSPF?
On 07/02/2012 05:07 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Well, that makes it even more weird...
Pinged as suggested from the MK to the UBNT device with the 100ms timeout.
Ran clean without one
Hello, we had this many times. Upgrading MK worked fine.
Martín Ruiz
El 03/07/2012, a las 00:07, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com escribió:
Well, that makes it even more weird...
Pinged as suggested from the MK to the UBNT device with the 100ms timeout.
Ran clean without one dropped packet
RIP actually...
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net wrote:
You set a default route on the MT back to the NOC, but what about from the
NOC to the MT is that static or OSPF?
On 07/02/2012 05:07 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Well, that makes it even more weird...
Pinged
Whelp, upgraded it to 5.18 and it's still doing it...
-Mike
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll give that a whirl.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Martín Ruiz Ibersystems
martinr...@ibersystems.es wrote:
Hello, we had this many times. Upgrading MK
9 matches
Mail list logo
