Re: [Mikrotik Users] Mikrotik and VLAN trunking

2017-01-13 Thread Mike Lyon via Mikrotik-users
Thank you everyone for your help. Appears I had the MK configured correctly the whole time and I had screwed up on the Netonix config. Oops! Thanks, Mike On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > This should help you ( translation from cisco vlan lingo to MT ROS Vlan). > > (this

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Mikrotik and VLAN trunking

2017-01-13 Thread Faisal Imtiaz via Mikrotik-users
This should help you ( translation from cisco vlan lingo to MT ROS Vlan). (this is assuming ROS defined VLAN's, not Switch-chip behavior). In the MT world, by default each Ethernet port is a Trunk Port. when you define a vlan on it, it is a Tagged vlan on that port. Each defined vlan on each

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Mikrotik and VLAN trunking

2017-01-13 Thread Judd Dare via Mikrotik-users
On Netonix set each port to E or empty as I am concerned. For each vlan on a particular port click to change it to T. Then on your trunk ports check the "trunk port / allowed vlans" and specify 1-4095 or whatever the limit is. Then the port going to your router can see all tagged traffic. Make sur

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Mikrotik and VLAN trunking

2017-01-13 Thread Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users
This is simple like all vlan applicationsfundamentals do not changeVlans on Netonix tagged on the port that faces the mikrotik. Of course you need to decide if your untagging or tagging the same vlans on the respected interface that is facing your host or network devices. On the tik y