Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

+1-251-517-5069 *From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>> on behalf of Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

ect: +1-251-517-5069 *From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>> on behalf of Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> *Sent

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

On 7/10/2019 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Fast track.  Path is for switching. Do you have any configuration suggestions? I tried the configuration example from https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Fasttrack and all it did was nail my CPU to the ceiling (100%). --

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 7:04 PM Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote: Had a CCR1009 get blown by lightning today. The only thing I had with an SFP to swap in its place was an RB2011UiAS. Typically running peak of about 5

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

On 7/10/2019 6:15 PM, Mike Francis wrote: You need fastpath.  You have to disable all rules for that to happen. That's not a problem,  especially if this is just a router. Make sure you specific allowed subnets for your ssh and win box services under UP Services. Get rid of all rules. Go to IP

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

On 7/10/2019 6:12 PM, Jesse DuPont via Mikrotik-users wrote: > The only thing I can think of that might help is to set the interface > queue on the high-traffic interfaces from hardware-only to > ethernet-default and increase the packet count to 100 on the > ethernet-default queue type. Might

[Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

Had a CCR1009 get blown by lightning today. The only thing I had with an SFP to swap in its place was an RB2011UiAS. Typically running peak of about 500Mbps in traffic in the evenings. I have disabled the LCD, turned off connection tracking, disabled all mangle rules, and disabled as many

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding for availability

Thanks all, I will look at doing this with OSPF. On 12/21/2018 11:43 AM, Robert Nickerson wrote: > We use OSPF for a setup of this type. It seems to work well. > > Thx > > RAN > > On 12/20/2018 3:43 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote: >> Greetings, >>

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Resetting Password

I have successfully used that procedure for CF installs before, just don't format the disk. On 8/24/2018 9:11 PM, Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users wrote: > Thank you very much! > > Had to borrow my wife's CF card reader but I was able to recover the > licenses on both units... > > -- > > > On

[Mikrotik Users] Multiple NAT targets

Is there a way to specify multiple to-address in a dst-nat rule? This may not even be the right way to approach the problem, but it's what came to mind. I am trying to take my inbound syslog traffic, and send it to two different syslog servers inside the firewall. Any suggestions? --

[Mikrotik Users] BGP Communities with 4 Byte ASN

I was hoping to use BGP communities with a backup link, to try to get certain types of traffic which are prefering the backup, to go to my primary. I had hoped to use BGP communities to do this, but I found that BGP communities do not support 4 byte ASN, and my backup path provider has a 4

[Mikrotik Users] Dude Export

I see that there's a CSV export in dude for device listings, but it doesn't have exactly what I'm looking for. Is there a way to export a CSV that would include the model of board, serial number, and first MAC address? I'm using this to import into my inventory control system. --

[Mikrotik Users] Bonding Configuration

https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Bonding_Examples I'm attempting to bond two DSL connections at a remote site, I was using an appliance for this but the service provider is discontinuing the service. Reviewing the document above, I encountered a challenge - the far side, being two PPPoE

[Mikrotik Users] WAP60G?

Has anybody heard any rumors on when it might be available? A friend of mine is wanting to try them out for building to building connections on his campus. -- --- - Nick Bright- - Vice President of Technology

Re: [Mikrotik Users] PPTP/EOIP tunnels break until reboot

I've seen it on rb600, rb800, rb1200, rb1100, rb2011, rb433 all versions, rb411 all versions. Doesn't seem to be hardware specific. On 5/30/2017 2:41 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote: Mine is x86 server rb750 client. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Am I just blind?

I like the wifi-texas stuff, I've had good results with it; though I do wish they had a model with remote control on/off per-port (or per-bank even). Selectable voltage per-bank would be nice too, but with complexity comes possibility of failures. I tried Netonix and have been very

Re: [Mikrotik Users] System/Health - temperature accuracy / bad sensors

On 6/28/2017 9:33 PM, Tommy Adams wrote: > I have s bunch of RB750UP's on powering backhauls and sectors. I see > these crazy temperature readings on a number of them. In one enclosure > the 750 says the temperature is 70C while the RB3011 says 45C. I have > driven to sites reporting these

Re: [Mikrotik Users] System/Health - temperature accuracy / bad sensors

On 6/28/2017 8:18 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users wrote: I think that's CPU temp? There's a separate OID for CPU Temperature on models that support it. This is the OID for system temperature. All of my RB750UP units are showing absurd values (even when not providing POE output power),

[Mikrotik Users] System/Health - temperature accuracy / bad sensors

How accurate is the temperature indicated, for routerboards which have temperature sensors? How common are bad sensors? Could accuracy vary by model? I have an RB750UP reading 76C and it seems like that must be an inaccurate reading or bad sensor, or the device would have failed. --

Re: [Mikrotik Users] network topology suggestions

On 5/28/2017 12:46 PM, Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users wrote: > > Joe, > > I too have spent thousands of hours building my networks. I'm tired > of wasting time and $$ on dis-information, half-way there solutions > and thought that perhaps I should be asking this particular group as > the members

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

I haven't used them, but I've heard quite a few people mention these before http://www.maxxwave.com/products/routermaxx/ On 5/8/2017 4:49 PM, Kevin Sullivan via Mikrotik-users wrote: Thanks. Just for clarification, we're only see 100% load on one core, not on the router as a whole. It's

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RouterOS

I also stay on the bugfix channel. On 5/4/2017 9:01 AM, Daniel Peoples via Mikrotik-users wrote: +1 for the bugfix release. /Daniel Peoples/ Resonance Broadband /Resonancebroadband.com/ 918-429-3620 On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Darin Steffl via

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

On 4/10/2017 1:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: hint... not sure who are your ISP's but in some cases, you can use bgp communities for their upstream (as long as they do not filter or overwrite the communities) to have the desired affect. Unfortunately that isn't an option, because of the topology.

[Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

Greetings, I'm working on a bit of BGP configuration that I'm having trouble making work as I'd like. There are three routers involved: 1. RouterA - connected to Primary Tier 1 ISP, does BGP with ISP-A. 1. I share this router with another WISP (we split the connection), so this

Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

On 4/3/2017 4:50 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote: > On 2/23/2017 8:37 PM, David Milholen via Mikrotik-users wrote: >> +1000 on ePMP >> > What he said. > Ops! Didn't realize I was scrolled down two months! @_@ -- -

Re: [Mikrotik Users] DUDE Discovery

On 3/9/2017 3:23 PM, Justin Wilson via Mikrotik-users wrote: > +1 to what Dennis says. The fact that you can’t move devices to different > maps after discovery (at least without hassle) is a major reason I don’t let > things auto discover. Setup your map and submaps then add your devices. It

Re: [Mikrotik Users] DUDE Discovery

That's of course the first thing I tried. It doesn't work. On 3/9/2017 1:19 AM, Daniel Biland wrote: in services to discover just click the mikrotik option -- --- - Nick Bright- - Vice President of Technology

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Which could be best radio for a ptp 200Mbps link?

On 11/23/2016 10:08 AM, RickG via Mikrotik-users wrote: > While a bit of a burden, that is a plus. Another plus is that it > should cut down on theft - if they police it? A friend of mine at another WISP gave me a pair of Mimosa B5 units. I could not use them at all until he "unadopted" them

Re: [Mikrotik Users] HTTP -> HTTPS redirect

On 11/2/2016 1:32 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote: > Is there a way to use the firewall to redirect an HTTP connection to HTTPS? > > Specifically for a site X, that site should only be available on HTTPS. > Clients connecting to HTTP should get a redirect to the HTTPS site,

Re: [Mikrotik Users] HTTP -> HTTPS redirect

On 11/2/2016 1:43 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote: > You can try dst nat rule. With dst address as the server and dst port 80. > Action redirect port 443 or even just dst-nat to same address but port 443. That won't work, because the client browser will not be expecting the encryption. --

[Mikrotik Users] HTTP -> HTTPS redirect

Is there a way to use the firewall to redirect an HTTP connection to HTTPS? Specifically for a site X, that site should only be available on HTTPS. Clients connecting to HTTP should get a redirect to the HTTPS site, like doing an HTTP redirect with HTML, but right in the firewall? --