You can tunnel port 2s and tunnel port 3s and run two eoip tunnels.
On May 3, 2017 12:18 AM, "Dan Harling via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users
> wrote:
> > I have a small network I need to modify
> >
> > There are
ave trees!
On Feb 24, 2017 1:34 PM, "T tech via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
> Tik metal 9.
>
> All we do is rural/remote. Hills and trees. Los requires 128 feet of
> height so we also build light weight, low cost towers.
>
>
&
in comparison to the ubnt
gear? I agree that Cambium gear in general is more well designed and GPS
sync is a must for urban areas, but some rural areas with limited LOS
require a cheap solution. In this case, do you pick ubnt or tik?
On 2/24/2017 7:31 AM, T tech via Mikrotik-users wrote:
At 200 devic
At 200 devices we moved from ubnt to mikrotik at 1,600 we are evaluating
cambium
Mikrotik positioned us for cambium
In 3-4 years mikrotik will be routing and inside wifi only
On Feb 23, 2017 9:38 PM, "David Milholen via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
> +1000 on ePMP
>
>
>
>
We trash this amount weekly. The 400 series can not meet the current
broadband levels and will negatively effect an entire network. CPU time is
the root issue. Today's need dictate 600mhz minimum and pushing the need
for 800-1100mhz.
On Sep 23, 2016 2:15 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users
Assigning a public IP should be done with routing not nating public on
customer router. Nating a private IP /24 to a public is a masquerade.
Multiple /24 private to different public IP multiple routers is best.
On Sep 21, 2016 12:32 PM, "Ken Patrick via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
Gateway is your main router .1 of private.
Private on own bridge
SRC nat 0/24 action masquerade
On Sep 21, 2016 11:04 AM, "Ken Patrick via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have run out of public IPV4 address and not ready to go to IPv6 yet.
>
> I am trying to sh
