David,
Thanks works fine now. I hate it when I miss something so obvious!!
Regards
Julia McWhirter
IT Manager
SuperH (UK) Ltd
First Floor
Network House
2410 Aztec West
Almondbury
Bristol
BS32 4QX
Tel : 01454 465600
Tel (Direct) : 01454 465661
Tel (Mobile) : 07979 913494
Fax : 01454 465601
Hi All,
A little off topic but Can anyone give me some pointers. I have
my mimedefang gateway ready to go but I wanted some advice before I put
it live.
The setup is as follows: mail coming in is forwarded from the firewall
to the mimedefang gateway which will then relay the mail on to
HI!
I am running a small mail server on PIII 500, 256MB RAM.
Not much traffic nor users.
I have come across a following problem:
Feb 26 15:57:08 computer sendmail[1464]: i1QDv2sh001464: from=someone,
size=1839746, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], bodytype=8BITMIME,
proto=ESMTP,
David and all
Maybe change that to *any* website. Then wait.
tod
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Martin Bene wrote:
Any ideas how to best get this address used by spammers?
Put the address on a busy web site. Post from it to Usenet. Wait.
Regards,
Hi,
I found the greylist implementation at
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-February/020126.html
very useful, and I made a little change to support a greylist 'whitelist'.
My intention is to not apply the greylist rules to local or trusted ip.
The white list is a BDB
Matthew Hall said:
OK, ways to bypass that? I'm collecting a 'spam' pile for analysis -
once I tag it as spam, I redirect to my spam storage mbox for a
looksie later.
Why not just save it with action quarantine?
I soon got tired of looking at 500 spam messages a day.
--Luke
Within the past few days, someone published that he had put together
files that could be used with sa-learn. I have searched the archives but
could not find the message. I would like the subject of the message
and/or the URLs from the message as I would like to try improving my
spam/ham ratio for
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:55, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
[analysis snipped]
Thanks for your report. I guess I'll have to change it now that Feb is
almost over at least until next year when such sentiments become valid
again.
:-)
ger
Peter A. Cole wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michael Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(3) Sometimes I'll temporarily use
action_add_header() to add debug information directly into the
headers of a message I'm using as a test.
I'll have a go at doing this tonight. I assume by simply
Lucas,
No problem, wish I could have helped more. I am happy that the novarg test
didnt break things...
I have found a better way of doing the same thing.
# Novarg Detection - PWhittney V1.1 2/25/04
#
if (lc($ext) =~ /zip/) {
my $lines = $entity-body();
my $found =
I forgot to mention that I discovered that it wasn't just large zip files, it
was all large attachments. Anyway, I believe the problem is fixed for now.
Thanks,
Lucas
On 26 Feb 2004 at 12:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is possible that these messages contain a de-compression bomb (a
small
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/26/2004 02:25:03
AM:
Ok, unusual request - I'm looking for ways to get MORE spam sent to
a new email account: I'm setting up a spam-trap to hopefully help
filtering for the other accounts. Obviously, the more spam address
lists etc. this trap is on, the
Hi,
I have implemented greylisting in filter_begin, it works great,
but there is still an issue because there are some spam software
that keep the connection open after they get temporary failure message.
The sendmail default timeout to wait a command (confTO_COMMAND) is
1 hour, so if I set the
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Martin Bene wrote:
Any ideas how to best get this address used by spammers?
Put the address on a busy web site. Post from it to Usenet. Wait.
Regards,
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
I would say that anything other than simply letting the spam come to you is
a bad idea and would risk tainting your results. Things you can do to
increase the spam coming in that I can think of:
Use the email address on the public whois data.
Capture all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] emails since a lot
15 matches
Mail list logo
