Here's the note I've posted and developed from numerous sources:
RedHat 8 and 9 Users Perl Requirement:
With the recent patches to Perl 5.8.0, RH8 users are now having some of
the same Perl development issues that RH9 users have been having. Due to
this, please realize that most of these issues
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Steve Pfister wrote:
> I seem to have UTF-8... here's my /etc/sysconfig/i18n:
>
> LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
> SUPPORTED="en_US.UTF-8:en_US:en"
> SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16"
>
> What should I change it to?
LANG="C" will work.
-- Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I seem to have UTF-8... here's my /etc/sysconfig/i18n:
LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
SUPPORTED="en_US.UTF-8:en_US:en"
SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16"
What should I change it to?
Thanks,
--Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alexander Dalloz
Sent: Wedne
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
> I am involved with an OSS project that is in desperate need of a tool
> like MD. Traffic is heavy, say in the order of 100k messages per day.
> Does any one use MD to handle this load and what configuration is
> needed?
MD plus SpamAssassin on a
I'm running MIMEDefang 2.40 and SpamAssassin 2.63. For reasons I'd just
as soon not waste bandwidth explaining, I'd like to perform SpamAssassin
checks on mail containing two specific users as recipients (if others
happen to be on the recipient list, it's ok). Presumably I would modify
filte
I am involved with an OSS project that is in desperate need of a tool
like MD. Traffic is heavy, say in the order of 100k messages per day.
Does any one use MD to handle this load and what configuration is
needed?
Please reply directly and I will summarize to the list.
--
Dream BIG dreams! Other
Dirk Mueller said:
> Hmm, thats fairly old.
Then what is new? That is the latest debian release,
and latest production is .67.
>> clamscan --mbox --no-summary --infected ./
>
> can you try ENTIRE_MESSAGE only?
>
> is it possible that by the time the mail was scanned first time, your
> clamav
> sign
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Thomas B. Butler wrote:
>
> > We're testing MIMEDefang 2.40 with SpamAssassin 2.63 on Perl 5.8.1 on
> > Solaris 8.
>
> Perl's UTF-8 handling leaves much to be desired. Make sure that
> mimedefang and mimedefang-multiplexor run in t
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Jon R. Kibler wrote:
> "Thomas B. Butler" wrote:
> >
> > Solaris 8.
>
> > Sometimes (but not always) when we receive SPAM in foreign character sets
> > (maybe just Russian and Chinese?), the message contents get mixed in with
> > other lines from other messages.
>
> We have se
Chris Cameron wrote:
> Performance wise, would I be better off to run my AntiVirus through
> MIMEDefang, or to just use two milters?
That depends on how MD is able to call your antivirus program- it seems
that most can only be called as a command-line program, so running the
provided milter will p
"Thomas B. Butler" wrote:
>
> Solaris 8.
> Sometimes (but not always) when we receive SPAM in foreign character sets
> (maybe just Russian and Chinese?), the message contents get mixed in with
> other lines from other messages.
We have seen problems on older versions of Solaris where a spamm
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Thomas B. Butler wrote:
> We're testing MIMEDefang 2.40 with SpamAssassin 2.63 on Perl 5.8.1 on
> Solaris 8.
Perl's UTF-8 handling leaves much to be desired. Make sure that
mimedefang and mimedefang-multiplexor run in the "C" locale, and
that should avoid the problem.
Regar
> Your response makes the most sense. I've added defang as a trusted user,
> restored group membership back to the way it was for user "defang", double
> checked the queue dirs, and reread sendmail.cf with a "killall -1
sendmail".
>
> I'll monitor this and see what happens.
You should also be abl
Maybe someone on the list has some ideas because there is nothing in the
FAQs or the archives, as far as I can tell...
We're testing MIMEDefang 2.40 with SpamAssassin 2.63 on Perl 5.8.1 on
Solaris 8. All of the other Perl dependencies are up to date, as far as I
know, including the special patch
I made a mistake. The feature should be added to the submit.mc
and not sendmail.mc (I think that makes sense).
Sorry about that.
-Paul Whittney
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:32:38AM -0500, Paul Whittney wrote:
> I think this is where the sendmail trusted users comes in.
> May also depend on the log
Paul -
Your response makes the most sense. I've added defang as a trusted user,
restored group membership back to the way it was for user "defang", double
checked the queue dirs, and reread sendmail.cf with a "killall -1 sendmail".
I'll monitor this and see what happens.
KEN CORMACK, RHCE
Sr. U
I'm now confused. I just looked at my sendmail binary, and it is SETGID to
smmsp. So theoretically, any process calling sendmail should behave as
though it were already group smmsp when it tries to write to the
clientmqueue directory.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I think this is where the sendmail trusted users comes in.
May also depend on the logging options of your sendmail setup
I've not tested this yet (but I'm getting there)...
In the .mc file for your site add:
FEATURE(`use_ct_file')dnl # trusted-users
(It may be in as default...)
Sho
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I've never had to do this but I might not have seen the issue. DFS, any
> input if this should be a necessary step for all installations?
No. Sendmail should be installed sgid "smmsp":
$ ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail
-rwxr-sr-x1 root smmsp
Hi,
I'm wondering when a 2.41 will be around (or at least a beta with the fixes)
since 2.40 has too many bugs and I'm not willing yet to go back to an old
mimedefang version.
Dirk
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDef
> Thanks for reminding me that the local submission queue is clientmqueue,
and
> not mqueue.
> It's "native" perms were:
>
> drwxrwx---2 smmspsmmsp4096 Oct 3 12:09 clientmqueue
>
> I've made "defang" a member of group smmsp. I'll monitor, to see if that
> c
Alan,
Thanks for reminding me that the local submission queue is clientmqueue, and
not mqueue.
It's "native" perms were:
drwxrwx---2 smmspsmmsp4096 Oct 3 12:09 clientmqueue
I've made "defang" a member of group smmsp. I'll monitor, to see if that
On Thursday 11 March 2004 19:30, Lucas Albers wrote:
> I am running .67-6 of clamav for debian.
Hmm, thats fairly old.
> clamscan --mbox --no-summary --infected ./
can you try ENTIRE_MESSAGE only?
is it possible that by the time the mail was scanned first time, your clamav
signature database
23 matches
Mail list logo
