--On Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:28 PM -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to clarify in case the recipient doesn't know perl, it's uc() not
toupper(). Me thinks you are tired and have been fraternizing with the
devil aka PHP.
Or the other devil, AKA C. (I didn't see that er
> One simple way would be to force the whole match into upper case. I.e.:
>
> if (($type eq "text/plain") and
> toupper($entity->head->mime_attr("content-type.charset")) eq
> "WINDOWS-1251") {
Just to clarify in case the recipient doesn't know perl, it's uc() not
toupper(). Me thinks you are
One simple way would be to force the whole match into upper case. I.e.:
if (($type eq "text/plain") and
toupper($entity->head->mime_attr("content-type.charset")) eq
"WINDOWS-1251") {
(Not tested, and I've had a long enough day that I've probably managed
to something glitchy there, but at
In my sub filter, I have the following three lines:
if (($type eq "text/plain") and
$entity->head->mime_attr("content-type.charset") eq "Windows-1251") {
return action_bounce("Charset Windows-1251 not accepted here");
}
...which successfully bounces anything matching that char
-On Behalf Of Ashley M. Kirchner
- In my sub filter, I have the following three lines:
>
> if (($type eq "text/plain") and
> $entity->head->mime_attr("content-type.charset") eq "Windows-1251") {
> return action_bounce("Charset Windows-1251 not
> accepted here");
> }
You sh
> -Original Message-
> From: David Reta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:27 PM
>
> I have some weird behavior. I was wondering if anyone has
> some insight before I start troubleshooting the problem. I am
> using spamassassin 2.63 and mimedefang 2.42. It se
> I tried to count mail traffic with MIMEDefang. Everything goes fine but
> sometimes i see empty strings in my maillog file, such as:
> Tue Apr 13 19:58:54 2004
> 42080
> There is no ip and recipient.
> How can i solve this problem?
Simply use the "mailstats" command. It will give you output tha
I have some weird behavior. I was wondering if anyone has some insight before I start
troubleshooting the problem. I am using spamassassin 2.63 and mimedefang 2.42. It
seems that some spam mail is getting through the filters. I run the message manually
and it scores as spam, but it is still pass
> Are you saying that you simply forward for these 20 mail servers with no
clue as to who is a valid user on those servers?
>
> If that is the case, you may want to implement some way of dumping user
names on each target's LDAP systems and creating a virtusertable to validate
email addresses. Could
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Ken Morley wrote:
> I would like to automatically save samples of spam and ham in a directory on
> the SA/MIMEDefang server.
>
> Specifically, when SA/MIMEDefang encounters a message with a score less than
> 0.5, I would like to save a copy in /etc/mail/spamassassin/corpus/ham
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > What is a good value to use for MaxRecipientsPerMessage
> > > > > (MAX_RCPTS_PER_MESSAGE) for sendmail?
>
> > 100
>
> How did you arrive at that number?
One interpertation of RFC 2821 would make it a requirement that 100 be the
minumum that i
Hello!
I tried to count mail traffic with MIMEDefang. Everything goes fine but
sometimes i see empty strings in my maillog file, such as:
Tue Apr 13 19:58:54 2004
42080
There is no ip and recipient.
How can i solve this problem?
See my minedefang-filter below.
Thanx!
Egor Moskvichev
$SALocalTests
Our Spam Assassin/MIMEDefang Linux server "front ends" our Exchange server
and is working very well.
I would like to automatically save samples of spam and ham in a directory on
the SA/MIMEDefang server. Does anyone have any suggested code and placement
for doing this?
Specifically, when SA/MIME
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The problem is that the system filters for 20+ destination mail servers,
> with no common directory. I may try to implement LDAP lookups in sendmail
> in the future, but that will be complicated by tryinig to figure out how
> to query the right server depending on the
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Kelson Vibber wrote:
>
>> Then SURBL should be fine. It's just a RHSBL, built from domains
>> advertised in spam rather than domains that (appear to) send it. A client
>> using SURBL just parses URLs out of the message and queries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/13/2004 03:47:36
PM:
> The problem with this option is that if you are using a single host
> or configuration for both inbound and outbound mail, then the limit
> will also apply to your users. If you use it, 5 is probably as good
> of value as any under these cir
> > > > What is a good value to use for MaxRecipientsPerMessage
> > > > (MAX_RCPTS_PER_MESSAGE) for sendmail?
> 100
How did you arrive at that number? In my reading of the book _sendmail_
by Eric Allman, any recipients beyond the limit set by this will get
tempfailed and mail system following
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>> 1) It is ssloww. Since it isnt run milterized/daemonized.. you are
>> basically asking mimedefang to exec a new copy of it each time.
>
>There is a package called "Trophie" which supposedly allows you
>to
> > What is a good value to use for MaxRecipientsPerMessage
> > (MAX_RCPTS_PER_MESSAGE) for sendmail?
100
We set it to 50 about a year ago to make some other host on campus
happy. Put it this way- I have not thought about it since.
Joseph Brennan
Academic Technologies Group, Academic Informatio
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
20 matches
Mail list logo
