[Mimedefang] Re: MD upgrade - how?

Michal Szymanski asked: What is the recommended way of upgrading MD? [...] So maybe I should just install the new one over the existing version, saving local changes done in 'mimedefang-filter'? A general advice: be a pessimist and expect things go wrong after the upgrade. (Sorry David...

Re: [Mimedefang] Spammer zombie group behaviour

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:57:54 +0100, in local.mimedefang you wrote: is now being transmitted multiple times. That wouldn't be a problem with greylisting after the RCPT TO command, but too many folks use nasty Novell Groupwise for me to get away with that. I'm just experimenting with adding

RE: [Mimedefang] Spammer zombie group behaviour

I'm just experimenting with adding greylisting, and doing it after the RCPT TO. I'm curious as to why Groupwise makes that a problem. See http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-January/019541.html Also, note that Groupwise has had several security problems in its SMTP

Re: [Mimedefang] limit message size

I would do this through sendmail such as define(`confMAX_MESSAGE_SIZE', `1000')dnl. However, I guess you could do something in filter() like this: $sizelimit = 1048576; #1MB limit unless (-s $entity-bodyhandle-path = $sizelimit) { return action_drop_with_warning(Message is larger than

[Mimedefang] greylist db size limit?

Ok, let's just say that you never quite got around to running the greylist db cleaner. Is there a limit to the size that the greylist db can get? Mine suspiciously seems to have topped out at 1024, and didn't seem to want to get any bigger (and in fact, I had some mail that kept bouncing

RE: [Mimedefang] Filtering new Mirosoft virus email ...

Hi Ken, I tried installing your script on my mailserver, but it has a strange behaviour. I added these lines into subjects_full: re:.thanks! re:.approved Mirko - I'm assuming by script you mean the sendmail LOCAL_RULESET CheckSubject rule that I use, in sendmail.mc/cf. Generally

RE: [Mimedefang] Bounce if its not for a local user.

Yes in fact it will be used as a relay, sorry I did not state that in my first mail. This is perfect for what we need. Thank you !! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL

Re: [Mimedefang] Embedded perl

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Henrik Schmiediche wrote: What is the advantage to Embedding Perl in the muliplexor? Faster startup time and much less memory use. Why is it not enabled by default? Because it's broken on some platforms. It's fine on Linux, mostly fine on Solaris 9, and all bets are off

RE: [Mimedefang] Embedded perl

Thanks... How can you test if a given implementation is safe? Does Perl need to be compiled in any special way to enable embedded Perl to work? Sincerely, - Henrik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David F. Skoll Sent: Friday,

Re: [Mimedefang] MD upgrade - how?

--On Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:14 PM +0200 Michal Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So maybe I should just install the new one over the existing version, saving local changes done in 'mimedefang-filter'? Before modifying the stock filter, I make a copy called mimedefang-filter.original. When