OK, just one question then:
If I call append_html_boilerplate (with 0 as second
parameter) will it append the disclaimer to the first
text/html part regardless of whether it's the main
body or an attachment?
--- Chris Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I did a search but couldn't find
Hi,
I've noticed one bad thing with the IP which mimedefang report
as infected.
If the mail goes through several relay, it report last relay as being
infected, and obsviously, it's not this IP which is infected but the
sender.
For example :
Received: from smtp11.aaa.com.sg (smtp11.aaa.com.sg
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Jerome Tytgat wrote:
Maybe mimedefang should take care of these Received lines ?
Received: lines can be faked.
Regards,
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hu ?
how do you know about the originating IP adress so ??
I understand that it's surely possible to add received lines
to make believe the sender is someone else, but there's surely
a way to analyze the sanity of received lines, this may be a good thing.
what about making us the choice of
Jerome,
Sendmail, for right or for wrong, and the infrastructure of the internet
mailing systems is based on a system of culpability. Imagine an email as a
baton passed from one runner to the next.
All your server can verify (and all you really *need* to know) is the last
server that just
Hi folks,
I just got Graphdefang 0.9 running but I'm having some problems with one
of the graph types. The total count of viruses and top 9 senders of
viruses show up OK, but Graphdefang generates an empty .png file for the
list of virus types (daily/hourly/monthly virus_value1_stacked_bar.png)
On Fri, 14 May 2004 16:30:25 +0200, Jerome Tytgat wrote:
Even for stats reasons MDLOG entries cannot be trusted !
Why not?
The way I see it, they can be trusted for statistics. But of course you have to
actually know what it is they log before you decide how to interpret them.
And of course
7 matches
Mail list logo
