I installed mimedefang just yesterday, with clamav as the virus checker --
it's reduced my spam by 99%!
Excellent software, thank you!
--
My GPG public key is at http://ronware.org/
fingerprint: 4E91 06E9 2020 114C 8BCD 55B2 0816 60AF 2B3D 4C51
_
Lucas Albers wrote:
This is on debian?
You should have a 3-5 second delay from sendmail starting, pausing,
then starting mimedefang.
If mimedefang restarts it should have a 3 second delay on the restart.
These are the defaults on debian.
I annoy debian maintainer on a regular basis...
Try putting i
This is on debian?
You should have a 3-5 second delay from sendmail starting, pausing,
then starting mimedefang.
If mimedefang restarts it should have a 3 second delay on the restart.
These are the defaults on debian.
I annoy debian maintainer on a regular basis...
Try putting in a delay between s
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:10:48 -0600, Eric Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
Hi ;)
> I sure hope you can help me out I'm lost on what to try next here.
I hope so too. One thing I noticed:
> and it creates the /var/spool/mimedefang.sock
in your .mc files you've got
> `S=unix:/var/
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:20:23PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David F. Skoll wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Ehhh... DomainKeys can be trivially saved from this trivial defeat.
> >> Just have the sending M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Ehhh... DomainKeys can be trivially saved from this trivial defeat.
>> Just have the sending MTA create separate envelopes for each
>> recipient. Then add an X-Envelope-To: head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> It's not so easy to send bulk email through a Yahoo SPF-authorized
>> server. I'm sure they have some kind of per-account rate-limiting.
>
> But you only need to send the mess
Jonas posted this code a few months ago, and I waited to see what the
response from the list was, but it never seemed to come back up. Has
anyone else implemented this code with good results? Have any changes been
made to this code, or is this ready to use as it stands?
Thanks,
-John
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Eric Murray wrote:
> 1st Senario (One more Senario Below)*
> My Sendmail is working good, SpamAssassin looks good, and ClamAV is
> Scanning / Updating etc and can be ran manually fine.
> But (Always a but hey) when I restart Sendmail I get the following in my
> /var/log/mail
>
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's not so easy to send bulk email through a Yahoo SPF-authorized
> server. I'm sure they have some kind of per-account rate-limiting.
But you only need to send the message once. Once you have the
DomainKeys signature, you can send it in bulk thro
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ehhh... DomainKeys can be trivially saved from this trivial defeat.
> Just have the sending MTA create separate envelopes for each recipient.
> Then add an X-Envelope-To: header. Finally have the MTA sign each envelope
> independently before delivery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Rife wrote:
> If the receiving server doesn't reject, but instead bounces,
> the bounce
> goes to the *envelope sender* (per the RFC). Thus, if a bad guy
> doesn't like a domain, they just have to put a bogus envelope sender
> from that domain, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> But wouldn't this require access to an account on the domain you are
>> going to claim the email is from?
>
> Yes, but it's easy enough to get a throwaway Yahoo account.
It's
Hi Everyone,
I sure hope you can help me out I'm lost on what to try next here.
I've followed the guide linked from mimedefang.org and i'm so close (I
think) but having a problem.
*
1st Senario (One more Senario Below)*
My Sendmail is working good, SpamAssassin looks good, and ClamAV is
Scanning
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But wouldn't this require access to an account on the domain you are going
> to claim the email is from?
Yes, but it's easy enough to get a throwaway Yahoo account.
> If I want a message signed by Citibank, I would need access to send a
> message fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/18/2004 08:39:53
AM:
> Furthermore, DomainKeys is trivially defeated with a replay attack.
> Send yourself the spam through the signing server. Now you have a
signed
> spam that you can re-mail far and wide. Of course, you can't mutate it,
> which might increase t
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Jeff Rife wrote:
> > http://www.sendmail.net/dk-milter/
> Oh, yuck. Sorry for the long rant, but...
[Long rant deleted]
Furthermore, DomainKeys is trivially defeated with a replay attack.
Send yourself the spam through the signing server. Now you have a signed
spam that y
17 matches
Mail list logo
