Re: [Mimedefang] virus scanner errors..

2004-09-21 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:30 PM -0500 Keith Patton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Problem running virus scanner: code=0.54296875,stat=Problem running virus-scanner I'm on Solaris 9 running mimedefang 2.43 with clamav 0.70 Some virus scans work others give this error... ( wierd error )... Ar

Re: [Mimedefang] virus scanner errors..

2004-09-21 Thread Lucas Albers
Keith Patton said: > Now I am seeing messages like that I wasn't seeing before... > > Sep 22 05:14:16 local52 mimedefang-multiplexor[2595]: [ID 980602 > mail.info] Slave 2 stderr: Out of memory! > Sep 22 05:14:16 local52 mimedefang-multiplexor[2595]: [ID 817788 > mail.error] Slave 2 ran out of me

Re: [Mimedefang] virus scanner errors..

2004-09-21 Thread Keith Patton
Chris Gauch wrote: Ok, I'm stumped.. In my mail log I'm getting.. Problem running virus scanner: code=0.54296875,stat=Problem running virus-scanner Interesting...I've had this same message show up in the maillog; generally MIMEDefang has crashed by the time that message shows up. I recently u

Re: [Mimedefang] allow local aliases w/ md_check_against_smtp_server

2004-09-21 Thread -ray
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Ron Peterson wrote: > I needed something like this to implement mailman on our our email > gateway. Ron, I had to do the same thing but decided to use a lists.selu.edu subdomain for mailman lists, so i avoid the md_check_against_smtp_server in filter_recipient like this.

Re: [Mimedefang] allow local aliases w/ md_check_against_smtp_server

2004-09-21 Thread Ron Peterson
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 09:17:54AM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Ron Peterson wrote: > > > Yeah, I thought about that, but it just seems silly to be reading > > /etc/aliases over and over every time a new message comes in (this is a > > pretty busy server, too). > > So do it

RE: [Mimedefang] virus scanner errors..

2004-09-21 Thread Chris Gauch
> Ok, I'm stumped.. > > In my mail log I'm getting.. > > Problem running virus scanner: code=0.54296875,stat=Problem running > virus-scanner > Interesting...I've had this same message show up in the maillog; generally MIMEDefang has crashed by the time that message shows up. I recently updated

Re: [Mimedefang] virus scanner errors..

2004-09-21 Thread David F. Skoll
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Keith Patton wrote: > I'm on Solaris 9 > running mimedefang 2.43 with clamav 0.70 Step 1: Upgrade to ClamAV 0.75.1 and see if it fixes it. Regards, David. ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mail

[Mimedefang] virus scanner errors..

2004-09-21 Thread Keith Patton
Ok, I'm stumped.. In my mail log I'm getting.. Problem running virus scanner: code=0.54296875,stat=Problem running virus-scanner I'm on Solaris 9 running mimedefang 2.43 with clamav 0.70 Some virus scans work others give this error... ( wierd error )... any light would be appreciated.. regards,

Re: [Mimedefang] again - Overlong line in RESULTS file

2004-09-21 Thread Jeff Rife
On 20 Sep 2004 at 11:13, Kelson wrote: > If you're only adding X-Spam-Status, then it shouldn't cause problems. That's what I'm doing, so that explains it. -- Jeff Rife| "I feel the need...the need for SPAM bait: | expeditious velocity" [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mimedefang] OT - Problem sending display name

2004-09-21 Thread Alberto da Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2004/09/21 16:12:10: > Group, > > I appologize for the off-topic post. But before I go nuts, I'm hoping the > SMTP gurus here might have a quick answer. > > I have a developer trying to write an app that sends email. It is speaking > SMTP directly to my internal se

[Mimedefang] multiplexor / fedora x86_64

2004-09-21 Thread John
I'm having an issue with the multiplexor ever since i installed on my new server. I can only assume it has something to do with the fact i'm now using 64-bit OS rather than 32? Here is my error. Sep 21 10:49:59 localhost sm-msp-queue[2891]: i8GF23Kd003459: to=root, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=4

Re: [Mimedefang] OT - Problem sending display name

2004-09-21 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Not sure what you mean but I think you want to do exactly what is shown below: From: "Ken Cormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Regards, KAM - Original Message - From: "Ken Cormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:12 AM Subject: [Mimedefang] OT -

RE: [Mimedefang] OT - Problem sending display name

2004-09-21 Thread Damrose, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Ken Cormack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > He's trying to get > the "display name" to go along with the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in > the MAIL FROM: > portion of the SMTP dialogue. I've tried finding a clear > specific reference > for the syntax, but have come u

Re: [Mimedefang] OT - Problem sending display name

2004-09-21 Thread David F. Skoll
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Ken Cormack wrote: > I have a developer trying to write an app that sends email. It is speaking > SMTP directly to my internal sendmail 8.13.1 SMTP relay. He's trying to get > the "display name" to go along with the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the MAIL FROM: > portion of the SMTP

[Mimedefang] OT - Problem sending display name

2004-09-21 Thread Ken Cormack
Group, I appologize for the off-topic post. But before I go nuts, I'm hoping the SMTP gurus here might have a quick answer. I have a developer trying to write an app that sends email. It is speaking SMTP directly to my internal sendmail 8.13.1 SMTP relay. He's trying to get the "display nam

Re: [Mimedefang] allow local aliases w/ md_check_against_smtp_server

2004-09-21 Thread David F. Skoll
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Ron Peterson wrote: > Yeah, I thought about that, but it just seems silly to be reading > /etc/aliases over and over every time a new message comes in (this is a > pretty busy server, too). So do it once per slave, in filter_initialize. (Unless your aliases file changes ofte

Re: [Mimedefang] allow local aliases w/ md_check_against_smtp_server

2004-09-21 Thread Ron Peterson
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 09:53:36AM +0200, Jan Pieter Cornet wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 12:11:06AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: > > I'd use md_check_against_smtp_server in filter_recipient. I'd like to > > add some local aliases, and not have md_check_against_smtp_server stomp > > them. > > >

Re: [Mimedefang] allow local aliases w/ md_check_against_smtp_server

2004-09-21 Thread Jan Pieter Cornet
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 12:11:06AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: > I'd use md_check_against_smtp_server in filter_recipient. I'd like to > add some local aliases, and not have md_check_against_smtp_server stomp > them. > > I can easily put a wrapper around the call to to > md_check_against_smtp_serv