Re: [Mimedefang] REPOST: SECURITY: MIME-tools patch

David, What is your opinion of the severity of the bug? Does it crash MD? Will an A/V scan still detect the issue? Regards, KAM ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaring

[Mimedefang] REPOST: SECURITY: MIME-tools patch

Hi, I just realized that PGP mangles patches. Oh, well. Here it is unsigned; check the signed message to make sure you're not being trojaned. :-) Regards, David. === RCS file: /home/cvsroot/MIME-tools/lib/MIME/Field/ParamVal.pm,v

[Mimedefang] SECURITY: Patch for MIME-tools

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, There's a bug in MIME-tools: It mis-parses things like boundary="" and apparently there's a virus that uses an empty boundary. You probably want to patch your MIME-tools installation with this patch; I'll be releasing a new MIME-tools

Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.46-BETA-1 is available

David F. Skoll wrote: Hi, MIMEDefang 2.46-BETA-1 is available at http://www.mimedefang.org/node.php?id=1 I've just compiled it. However, I'm having two problems with it (regarding my previous mail about detecting content-type in filter_end). First is that Content-Type (as present in $entity) sti

Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.45 compile errors ??

On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:47:45PM +1000, Bill Maidment wrote: > Brent J. Nordquist wrote: > >What I'm discovering about Perl under FC2 x86_64 is that things seem > >to be split between /usr/lib and /usr/lib64. > >[...] > >Using --disable-check-perl-modules at least fixed the warning, > > [...] >

[Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.46-BETA-1 is available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, MIMEDefang 2.46-BETA-1 is available at http://www.mimedefang.org/node.php?id=1 The main change is a fix to the way messages are rebuilt. Now, filter_end sees the true type of the message (rather than always getting a multipart/mixed entity). Al

Re: [Mimedefang] FYI: SOCKETMAP added to Red Hat sendmail package

--On Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:50 PM +0200 Alexander Dalloz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I didn't understand Thomas Wörner's WONTFIX bugzilla closure. He was probably new to packaging and didn't realize that the Perl dependency in the example code was a non-issue. That was my assumption when I

Re: [Mimedefang] FYI: SOCKETMAP added to Red Hat sendmail package

Am Di, den 26.10.2004 schrieb Kenneth Porter um 18:42: > That is good news! I didn't understand Thomas Wörner's WONTFIX bugzilla closure. I had opened a different bugzilla entry, because in former Sendmail 8.13 RPM the socketmap suppor

[Mimedefang] FYI: SOCKETMAP added to Red Hat sendmail package

___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Re: [Mimedefang] Memory problems

I wrote: I had MX_MAX_AS set to 6 and hit the limit within a few hours. MX_MAX_AS is now set to 10. SA is not definitely a memory pig. Opps. s/not definitely/most definitely/ ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang

Re: [Mimedefang] Detecting content-type of message in filter_end

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > I guess the release that fixes this bug will be 2.46? Yup. It will be out very soon. Regards, David. ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PRO

Re: [Mimedefang] Detecting content-type of message in filter_end

David F. Skoll wrote: There's a bug in MIMEDefang; the rebuilt entry that gets passed to filter_end is always of type multipart/mixed, multipart/alternative or multipart/digest. The next release will fix this. I see there's MIMEDefang 2.45 on the web site (I was still using 2.44). I guess the rel

Re: [Mimedefang] Gentoo packaging : mimedefang ebuild (for MIMEDefang 2.45)

Hi, Stephane. > So find attached an alpha/beta mimedefang Gentoo ebuild (aka FreeBSD port) > with the needed conf.d and init.d files. Thanks! > Please let me know how about bugs/enhancements so this either gets included > in the Gentoo portage tree or in the next MIMEDefang tarball (David > it's

Re: [Mimedefang] Memory problems

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, David F. Skoll wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Rob MacGregor wrote: MX_MAX_RSS=1 MX_MAX_AS=3 That's probably too low. SA is a memory pig; I'd give the slaves 50MB at least, and take out the RSS limit altogether. I had MX_MAX_AS set to 6 and hit the limit within a few h

Re: [Mimedefang] Detecting content-type of message in filter_end

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > BTW, while we are at it. Is there a reason why $entity is not passed as > an argument to filter_begin? It could be usefull if it was possible to > do some checks on the message before it is modified by MIMEDefang. It > would be more efficient

Re: [Mimedefang] Detecting content-type of message in filter_end

David F. Skoll wrote: There's a bug in MIMEDefang; the rebuilt entry that gets passed to filter_end is always of type multipart/mixed, multipart/alternative or multipart/digest. The next release will fix this. BTW, while we are at it. Is there a reason why $entity is not passed as an argument to

Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang + spamd

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > Might spamc/spamd gains from the fact that spamd pre-loads more things and > caches certain internal stuff, which is shared among multiple spamd > slaves, instead of kept into each MIMEDefang slave? Unlikely. I think the real speedup comes if there ar

Re: [Mimedefang] Gentoo packaging : mimedefang ebuild (for MIMEDefang 2.45)

Oh.. great, a new version of MIME-Tools. I was thinking about the same project and did not start because of the patched perlmodule. Good news! Regards, Mike No Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:24:55AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > - > > I've started wo

Re: [Mimedefang] Gentoo packaging : mimedefang ebuild (for MIMEDefang 2.45)

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:24:55AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > - > I've started working on making MIMEDefang installation on Gentoo Linux > easier > (we must contribute to OpenSource folks someway ...). > > Please note that the MIME-tools MIME-Base64 ebuils in Gentoo are up to > date

Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang + spamd

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, David F. Skoll wrote: On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, John Scully wrote: On any system with a lot of rule sets SA represents about 90% of the total message prosessing time. C vs perl makes a difference on that part. Yes, but I fail to see how spamd helps -- it still must, ultimately, cal

[Mimedefang] Brokwn Pipe

Hi, I've been receiving a few of these messages in my syslog. Oct 25 17:43:15 crow sendmail[3932]: [ID 801593 mail.info] i9PFhEn7003932: Milter (mimedefang): init success to negotiate Oct 25 17:43:15 crow sendmail[3932]: [ID 801593 mail.info] i9PFhEn7003932: Milter: connect to filters Oct 25 20:3