On 10 Nov 2004 at 14:17, Greg Miller wrote:
> Currently not using bayesian or whitelist. This is a dedicated sendmail
> box.
Part of what my company does is marketing (opt-in only lists, of
course), and some of that marketing is about drugs. Because of that,
we get a lot of what might be "spam
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 11:17 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Let's say you are running 40 sendmails. That should take about 120MB of
> ram. To run 40 sendmails, you need 10 to 15 mimedefangs running eating up
> say 400 to 600MB of RAM as a guess. Add a 128MB tmpfs and you are using a
> lot of
Let's say you are running 40 sendmails. That should take about 120MB of
ram. To run 40 sendmails, you need 10 to 15 mimedefangs running eating up
say 400 to 600MB of RAM as a guess. Add a 128MB tmpfs and you are using a
lot of RAM.
How large is your bayesian and whitelist files? What else i
Dave Williss wrote:
>>> Or how about the losers who program some BIOSes?
>>>
>>>"Keyboard error. Press F1 to continue."
>>
>> Or "Please reply if you did not recieve this message."
>>
> My favorite was on an old Data General workstation...
>
> Kernel Panic
> Would you like to take
Dave Williss wrote:
My favorite was on an old Data General workstation...
Kernel Panic
Would you like to take a system dump?
These days it would probably be:
Kernel Panic
Would you like to supersize it?
;-)
--
Aleksandar Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Pollard Banknote Limited
System
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 10:19 -0500, Brenden Conte wrote:
> How large is your tmpfs drive? Whats your usual mail volume?
>
> By default Linux allows itself to use 1/2 your ram per tmpfs drive.
>
> -Brenden
>
tmpfs is 128MB. Most of the time only 1MB or less is in use. Perhaps I
should make it sm
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:42 AM -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reminds me of the old online gaming joke. "Hey everybody, press Alt-F4
to activate (insert cool weapon name)"... then laugh as you see the
"(player) disconnected" messages start to come in...
A surprisi
ron jon wrote:
> I have a working setup (mimedefang-2.38 / SpamAssassin-2.60) running
You should upgrade SA to at least 2.64; there are a number of issues
including a known DoS attack. Check the SA changelog from 2.64 for the
full list.
> on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE.
> I recently tried to add a ne
Or how about the losers who program some BIOSes?
"Keyboard error. Press F1 to continue."
Or "Please reply if you did not recieve this message."
My favorite was on an old Data General workstation...
Kernel Panic
Would you like to take a system dump?
-- Dave Williss
--
Meddle not in the
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Mike Lambert wrote:
> The FreeBSD port maintainer uncomments MX_MAX_RSS and MX_MAX_AS in
> "examples/init-script.in", relying on the example size limits. Would it
> make sense to increase these example limits?
Exactly. I'll fix them in the example too.
Regards,
David.
How large is your tmpfs drive? Whats your usual mail volume?
By default Linux allows itself to use 1/2 your ram per tmpfs drive.
-Brenden
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 09:04, Greg Miller wrote:
> Platform is RedHat EL AS 3
> Dual Xeon 3.0 Ghz CPU
> 1 GB RAM
> Load is between 1-3 messages per second.
>
It is likely that your tmpfs (ramdisk) is too big for the amount of total
physical RAM installed in the system. Secondly, you don't state how many
concurrent processes you are running, and so on.
The system will swap when it runs low on usable RAM. Whatever RAM you've
dedicated to the tmpfs is n
Chris Myers wrote:
Check the mimedefang-filter manpage. You'll find a number of variables
are pre-set rather than being passed as an arguments. $RelayHostname and
and $RelayAddr will contain the information you need. There are others
that have information you may want to use as well, such as a l
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, ron jon wrote:
Nov 9 12:18:47 bug mimedefang-multiplexor: Slave 0 stderr: Out of memory!
Search the list archives -- this has come up a few times before.
The FreeBSD port maintainer uncomments MX_MAX_RSS and MX_MAX_AS in
"examples/ini
Platform is RedHat EL AS 3
Dual Xeon 3.0 Ghz CPU
1 GB RAM
Load is between 1-3 messages per second.
System performs very well, most of the time, with only 2-3 busy slaves.
However, on occasion, I will see all 15 of my slaves busy, lots of disk
I/O to swap, and "Please try again later" messages in t
Hi,
> Anybody has seen something similar ? The Milter does run just wonderful
> if there is always mail arriving. After ~3 minutes idle time, the multiplexer
> itself crashes.
>
> OS is FreeBSD 5.3R.
>
> #0 0x282217ef in skip (p=0x6 ) at
> /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/getttyent.c:183
Looks like it was
Tim,
Your emails come through what looks to me like an NNTP to SMTP conversion
system. Is that possibly munging your headers?
Regards,
KAM
"Tim Boyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's not installed, but just in case, I've got it commented out in
mimedefang-filter
The attached patch for MD 2.48 cleans up the mimedefang-filter man page
a bit, reflecting that the multiplexor is mandatory as of MD 2.34.
--
Brent J. Nordquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> N0BJN
Other contact information: http://kepler.its.bethel.edu/~bjn/contact.html
--- mimedefang-filter.5.in.orig 2004
- Original Message -
From: "Marco Supino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 5:49 AM
Subject: [Mimedefang] action_delete_all_headers
I want to use the action_delete_all_headers to remove a specific header
from emails, but i want this to run on
--On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:42 AM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Reminds me of the old online gaming joke. "Hey everybody, press Alt-F4
to activate (insert cool weapon name)"... then laugh as you see the
"(player) disconnected" messages start to come in...
A surprising number of people wil
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, ron jon wrote:
> Nov 9 12:18:47 bug mimedefang-multiplexor: Slave 0 stderr: Out of memory!
Search the list archives -- this has come up a few times before.
--
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMED
Hi,
I want to use the action_delete_all_headers to remove a specific header
from emails, but i want this to run only on "outgoing" emails, i already
have in filter_relay a check for outgoing emails, which makes it ignore
scan of outgoing emails, but this action can only be used in
filter_begin
Hi all,
Anybody has seen something similar ? The Milter does run just wonderful
if there is always mail arriving. After ~3 minutes idle time, the multiplexer
itself crashes.
OS is FreeBSD 5.3R.
#0 0x282217ef in skip (p=0x6 ) at
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/getttyent.c:183
#1 0x2828fdb2 in __collate_
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Reminds me of the old online gaming joke. "Hey everybody, press
> > Alt-F4 to activate (insert cool weapon name)"... then laugh
> as you see
> > the "(player) disconnected" messages start to come in...
>
> Or how about the losers who program s
24 matches
Mail list logo
