-ray wrote:
Also while poking around, some SURBL mails got through cause BAYES_00
gave a negative score. In general do ya'll let BAYES_* rules score
negative?
Well, that *is* what they're for. Anything under 50% is supposed to be
more likely legit than spam, based on mail you've seen before.
I took out the soft links.
I un-installed the Sun binary for perl 5.8.0 and re-installed perl 5.8.6
from source.
Library paths all look ok to me, I am looking first for libs in
/usr/local/lib so the lib's should not be a problem.
I re-installed some of the perl modules using CPAN.
It was not a glo
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, -ray wrote:
So just to confirm. For all the rules with 'tflag net' set, i should set
their score to zero in local.cf to avoid editing files in
/usr/share/spamassassin directly. If the score on a network test is already
zero, then spamassassin will just skip it. Correct?
F
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, David F. Skoll wrote:
That won't work in SpamAssassin 3.0.x. You have to enable network tests
for SURBL. To turn off the ones you don't want, set their scores to 0.
So just to confirm. For all the rules with 'tflag net' set, i should set
their score to zero in local.cf to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I hope you don't consider this an abuse of the MIMEDefang list, but...
We're announcing that small organizations (those with up to 50 e-mail
addresses), can use CanIt for free. Note that CanIt is still commercial
software; it's not open-source.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, -ray wrote:
> I've upgraded to Mimedefang 2.51 and Spamassassin 3.02, and SURBL lookup's
> stopped working.
SpamAssassin's code to detect whether or not DNS is available is, to
be kind, horrible.
Put this line:
dns_available yes
in your config file.
> One thing to
All,
I've upgraded to Mimedefang 2.51 and Spamassassin 3.02, and SURBL lookup's
stopped working. I read the thread from December and some work arounds
were mentioned, just wondering if anyone has deduced the "proper" way to
get SURBL going again. I've already copied init.pre to the
LOCAL_RULE
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Nels Lindquist wrote:
> > Huh. I've already become so fed up with Red Hat that I'm switching to
> > Debian anyway. (Exim is the default on Debian, but it's easy to
> > replace it with Sendmail.)
> Are you fed up with RedHat due to their packaging choices, or their
> pricin
On 23 Feb 2005 at 7:24, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Huh. I've already become so fed up with Red Hat that I'm switching to
> Debian anyway. (Exim is the default on Debian, but it's easy to
> replace it with Sendmail.)
Are you fed up with RedHat due to their packaging choices, or their
pricing/licen
On 23 Feb 2005 at 10:40, Joey McKnight wrote:
> What i should have said was i would like to be able to drop or bounce
> emails with keywords. I've got teachers that are receiving some very
> nasty emails.
Are you currently using SpamAssassin at all? If you're not, you
should seriously cons
10 matches
Mail list logo
