Kayne Kruse presumably uttered the following on 03/03/05 12:35:
Anyone else having problems with MD 2.51 and SA 3.0.2 on perl 5.6.1 on
FreeBSD 4-11-STABLE not seeing SURBL?
I am able to get SURBL checks working in command line test of email. Even
spamassassin -D -C /usr/local/etc/mimedefang/spama
Kayne Kruse wrote:
To actually shed more light, its ONLY SURBL thats not working. The Spamcop,
Spamhaus, NJABL, RFC-IGNORANT lookups are taging fine.
Is the SURBL plugin loading correctly? Check which init.pre is getting
read.
Regards,
David.
___
Visi
In gmane.mail.mimedefang, you wrote:
> good bit of attention to my mimedefang filter to accommodate for that (like
> discard instead of reject if the SPAM is coming from my secondary MX).
How are you testing for this? I've been wanting to do this for
a while, since my backup MX queue is alway
>
> Fairly certain, this is freebsd and I am using the FreeBSD
> ported version of
> mimedefang. It calls from
> /usr/local/etc/mimedefang/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
>
> Per freebsd docs that is one of the valid paths.
>
To actually shed more light, its ONLY SURBL thats not working. Th
Troy Carpenter wrote:
Quick Question: What is the advantage to using the Canit system over
the free Mimedefang?
The Web interface mostly, and a better Bayes engine. Greylisting.
The "Known Networks" feature.
Do I have the ability it Canit to customize the mimedefang
filter to behave similar to st
> Are you sure you're editing the right copy of
> sa-mimedefang.cf? Unless
> your filter code is explicitly pointing to that location,
> it's going to
> default to one of the following:
>
> /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf
> /etc/mail/spamasassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
> /etc/mail/spamasa
Are you sure you're editing the right copy of sa-mimedefang.cf? Unless
your filter code is explicitly pointing to that location, it's going to
default to one of the following:
/etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf
/etc/mail/spamasassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
/etc/mail/spamasassin/local.cf
Anyone else having problems with MD 2.51 and SA 3.0.2 on perl 5.6.1 on
FreeBSD 4-11-STABLE not seeing SURBL?
I am able to get SURBL checks working in command line test of email. Even
spamassassin -D -C /usr/local/etc/mimedefang/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf -t
< test.txt actually will produce sur
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 08:34:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told us:
> I know that they log warings if you are running an out of date version,
> but the only time I am ceratin they cut old versions off was when they
> went to the new model of checking for updates via DNS TXT records instead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that they log warings if you are running an out of date version,
but the only time I am ceratin they cut old versions off was when they
went to the new model of checking for updates via DNS TXT records instead
of HTTP connections. They let it slide for a while, t
> Hi,
>
> I hope you don't consider this an abuse of the MIMEDefang list, but...
>
> We're announcing that small organizations (those with up to 50 e-mail
> addresses), can use CanIt for free. Note that CanIt is still commercial
> software; it's not open-source. But it's "free-as-in-beer" for sma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/02/2005 04:35:10
PM:
> I understand that, of course. My only concern is that, if I am away for
a
> few weeks, my old AVP kept running, and that the ClamAV updater will
> refuse to update files for those weeks, just because I was not near the
> console to upgrade. I'
12 matches
Mail list logo
