On Sep 9, 3:09am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
}
} Now that we've hashed that out and one recipient per message isn't going
} to happen what is the best way to handle suspect messages that are
} streamed by recipient? I really like MIMEDefang (and CanIt Pro) because I
I discard them. This
On Sep 9, 3:16am, "David F. Skoll" wrote:
} [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
}
} > I'd rather not be doing
} > that... If SPF records were universally available with "-all", then we
} > could prevent this by enforcing them immediately at the MAIL FROM stage,
} > before even streaming by recipient.
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/20/2005 06:36:33
AM:
> I discard them. This isn't necessarily the best thing, but there
> isn't a lot I can do, especially if I don't want them sitting in my
> queue.
Having been on both sides of disappearing mail, I hate mail being
discarded. That's why the
I am using Mimedefang 2.39 (with sendmail 8.13.0) for a number of
purposes. One thing that I use it for is to BCC all incoming and outgoing
all emails to an archiving server.
The archiving server has an issue. If a user receives an email that was
bcc'd to him, there is evidence that the user
--On Wednesday, April 20, 2005 10:17 AM -0400 Mark Penkower
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can Mimedefang to the following:
Capture the emails before the bcc header information has been stripped.
Then bcc it to the archiving server. Then strip the bcc headers and
continue with the delivery.
That's n
I know this isn't the right forum, but it is kind of related.
I am finally trying to update my setup to the most current versions
(currently running SA 2.63 and MD 2.42).
When I try to install SA 3.02 I get the following response when I run
make (at least this is all that my buffer kept).
Any id
Mark Penkower wrote:
> The archiving server has an issue. If a user receives an email that
> was bcc'd to him, there is evidence that the user sent the email, but
> there is no evidence of who received it. The issue is the same if an
> internal user sends an email via bcc.
You'll have to add a h
Kris Deugau wrote:
> Mark Penkower wrote:
>> The archiving server has an issue. If a user receives an email that
>> was bcc'd to him, there is evidence that the user sent the email, but
>> there is no evidence of who received it. The issue is the same if an
>> internal user sends an email via bcc
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:12:13 -0700, Doug Hubbard wrote
> SpamAssassin-3.0.2' make: *** [spamc/spamc] Error 2
I would say you are missing or have an older version of a prerequisite.. I
would go through the install doc carefully and update/confirm version for
veery prereq... if you use CPAN this c
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 05:36, John Nemeth wrote:
> If somebody else is generating bounces on messages that I reject,
> I don't care. It isn't my problem. The somebody else should do a
> better job runing their mail server.
If you are doing stream by recipient and allowing individual
prefere
10 matches
Mail list logo
