[Mimedefang] OpenOffice-based scanner

Just saw this interesting project mentioned in the OpenOffice IRC channel: The idea is to run a SOAP server that handles OOo translation requests, and then build a module in .NET that links to MS Office to support the OASIS Open Document format. But it stru

Re: [Mimedefang] MIME-tools-5.418 install

I experienced this on a Solaris 9, I am also running Spamassassin 3.04 & ClamAv 0.87 Dj Helmes On 10/14/05, David F. Skoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dj Helmes wrote: > > I just tried installing the lastest MIME-tools-5.418. > > > t/Entity.FAILED test 5 > > Failed 1/30 tests, 96

RE: [Mimedefang] Sudden problem noted with File::Scan 1.43 and PD F attachments

David F. Skoll wrote: > Hmm, ok. Then it probably doesn't have anything to do with MIME::Tools. > I'm stumped. I really appreciate the effort you've given to this issue, David. :) Back in February, you asked if anyone used File::Scan. At the time, the complaint seemed to be with false positiv

Re: [Mimedefang] Sudden problem noted with File::Scan 1.43 and PD F attachments

Cormack, Ken wrote: > I just asked the developer about the quoted-printable encoding... He sent a > test PDF to his Exchange mailbox, then showed me the following header from > within Outlook... [...] > Content-Type: > application/pdf;name="6712110543-153006-10-19-2005.pdf" > Content

RE: [Mimedefang] Sudden problem noted with File::Scan 1.43 and PD F attachments

David F. Skoll wrote: > The REAL solution is: NEVER use Quoted-Printable encoding for PDF files. > Always use Base64. If you can somehow convince your AIX boxes to do > this, you should be OK. I just asked the developer about the quoted-printable encoding... He sent a test PDF to his Exchange m

Re: [Mimedefang] Sudden problem noted with File::Scan 1.43 and PDF attachments

Cormack, Ken wrote: [ Something corrupting some PDF files ] There is a horrible, ugly hack in MIME::Tools that attempts to deal with PDF files encoded using Quoted-Printable encoding. I suspect that something is triggering MIMEDefang to rebuild the message, and the horrible ugly hack isn't worki

[Mimedefang] Sudden problem noted with File::Scan 1.43 and PDF attachments

After a lot of head-scratching, I finally needed to disable File::Scan last night, on my MIMEDefang servers. Beginning two days ago, with no changes to either the gateway machines, or the systems that were generating the outbound emails bearing PDF attachmnets, our MIMEDefang servers began apparen

Re: [Mimedefang] DoS??

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/18/2005 02:09:36 AM: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The DNS servers in question are local, just another subnet. A local > Then it is not local -- for the services on the mail server :-) I consider it local, If anything breaks between the filte

Re: [Mimedefang] SA working but spam still goes through

> here is a header from spam that got through: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no > version=3.0.3 > > i don't get why it says autolearn=no ?? > when whould it say 'yes'? see perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf and specifically: bayes_auto_learn_thres

RE: [Mimedefang] SA working but spam still goes through

Meni wrote: > > here is a header from spam that got through: > X-Spam-Status:No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME > autolearn=no version=3.0.3 > > i don't get why it says autolearn=no ?? In its full generality, this is probably a question for the SpamAssassin list. This particu

[Mimedefang] SA working but spam still goes through

hi list, I started a thread before, got a lot of help, BUT spam still goes through even dough i use spam & ham mailboxes and run spam through sa-learn atleast once a week... :-( I have spam coming over and over again, even though i pass them in sa-learn... the command I use is: $sa-learn --showdot

RE: [Mimedefang] Removing the X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang

if you are using the rehdat jobbie, then either in (depending on which you are using) /etc/sysconfig/mimedefang or /etc/rc.d/init.d/mimedefang MD_EXTRA="-X" and that should do it Cheers Mack -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Houselan

[Mimedefang] Fprotd problems and patch

Hello, f-protd (demonized F-Prot) has a quirk. The scanner returns these result codes: # 0 Not scanned, unable to handle the object. # 1 Not scanned due to an I/O error. # 2 Not scanned, as the scanner ran out of memory. # 3 X The object is not of a type the scanner knows.

Re: [Mimedefang] AD: Roaring Penguin press release on Locked Addresses

Dirk Mueller wrote: > it will also fail in other cases, because people do have more than > one email address, and even if its the same person, they will not > use always the same sender address to contact you - for example they > might write with a different sender address depending on if they > a

Re: [Mimedefang] AD: Roaring Penguin press release on Locked Addresses

On Tuesday 18 October 2005 22:11, David F. Skoll wrote: > Actually, for "pure" VERP, it works fine, because the sender address > is constant for a given recipient. However, some mailing lists use > per-message VERP, which changes the envelope sender for every posting. it will also fail in other

[Mimedefang] Aplogoies -Removing the X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang

My apologies as soon I sent this email I found the -x switch in the manpage! That will teach me. Sorry Paul ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.r

[Mimedefang] Removing the X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang

Hi Sorry if this is a common question but ive googled and search the list and couldnt find a definive answer. I would like to not add the "X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on x.x.x.x header", I saw a message dated 2002 that it was fairly easy to edit the source and recompile but a command line swit