Thanks - that seemed to have done the trick. Now onto the next part ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
F. Skoll
Sent: 09 December 2005 08:18 PM
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] defang startup errors
Greg McCarthy wrote:
NOTE: This e-mail (including attachments) is subject to the
restrictions, qualifications and disclaimers (the disclaimer)
published at http://www.metropolitan.co.za Please read the
disclaimer before opening any attachments or taking any other action
in terms of this
So I actually read http://www.metropolitan.co.za/email_disclaimer.html
Among other things:
Article 2 prohibits copying of the e-mail. That means it can't be
archived. It can't even be downloaded from a POP3 server and left on
the server -- that's copying.
Article 3 warns of civil liability if
Hi,
I´d like to use SpamAssassin to check just my inbound e-mails. I use SA with
MIMEDefang and Sendmail.
How should I do configure mimedefang to don't call SA for outbound e-mails?
Tks!
Here is what I did. Also some additional stuff, but the first 'if' is
how I keep from filtering my
Wow David,
Bad hangover after a Saturday Night ? lol
However I do completely agree with you since i am obviously in violation of
article 2, since i collect my email in multiple locations, whilst leaving a
copy on the server.
Now of course, new legistlation that is coming in for financial
I agree with you David. The Disclaimers are getting out of control.
You are right about unsubscribing people from the list who append such
rediculous legalese..
-Ben
begin:vcard
fn:Ben Kamen
n:Kamen;Ben
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:O.D.T. - S.P.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
A mention of disclaimers should never go by without mention of Jeff's
netrant:
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Perhaps this should be in the wiki, since a request for a HOWTO comes up
here occasionally.
I keep meaning to add one of these to my sig:
The essential thing that is absurd is the attempt to transfer the burden
of confidentiality to the recipient.
Sadly, I've even seen mail from law firms advising me, in effect, that if
they have broken attorney-client privilege by sending me mail, it is now
somehow my problem.
Joseph Brennan
Joseph Brennan wrote:
The essential thing that is absurd is the attempt to transfer the burden
of confidentiality to the recipient.
I've decided to change the footer that the mailing list software adds
to each e-mail. See below.
Regards,
David.
Joseph Brennan wrote:
Sadly, I've even seen mail from law firms advising me, in effect, that if
they have broken attorney-client privilege by sending me mail, it is now
somehow my problem.
This has become a risk management checkbox item (Told client to add
confidentiality/privilege waiver
10 matches
Mail list logo
