-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mickey Hill wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 11:12 -0500, webmaster wrote:
Well, sa-mimedefang.cf doesn't exist. Where can I obtain it and what
does it say?
I believe it's in /etc/mail now.
I concur. Although I softlink
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006, David F. Skoll wrote:
Sendmail has every reason to assume that if an SMTP client has a
broken implementation of the state machine on one message attempt,
it probably will break on every attempt, so why tempfail?
This assumption would be wrong. This could be true if there
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006, Tomasz Ostrowski wrote:
I'm going to send a feature request to
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
- Forwarded message -
From: Tomasz Ostrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFE: Tempfail data when at least one rcpt to tempfailed and none
accepted
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 3
John Kennedy wrote:
In short:
I've added $SALocalTestsOnly = 0
I know both sa-mimedefang.cf and mimedefang-filter are being used
Standalone tests from defang user show razor checks
I see no evidence of razor checks added to headers/reports
I don't see
webmaster wrote:
nope. I searched my entire server and did not find it. where can I get a
copy?
It's installed by MIMEDefang.
If you haven't run make install yet, then you probably won't find it.
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications www.speed.net
--On Friday, March 03, 2006 10:57 AM +0100 Tomasz Ostrowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to send a feature request to
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
You could also post to comp.mail.sendmail. You'd then get input from a
larger community of sendmail users.
I would recommend uninstalling the Sun Sendmail packages before
installing another version. This avoids a Sun patch from overwriting
your newer version or any of your configuration. Do the same for Perl
and any other Sun supplied program you update.
___
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:43:01PM -0500, webmaster wrote:
nope. I searched my entire server and did not find it. where can I get a
copy?
Assuming you have the source code,
.../mimedefang-2.56/SpamAssassin/spamassassin.cf
___
NOTE: If
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 02:56:10PM -0500, Jeff Rife wrote:
This is why I turned to this group of experienced mail admins. I need
a way to justify occasionally delaying good e-mail to people who have
already said that occasionally *blocking* good e-mail (and thus
*really* delaying it) is
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:48:52AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
However, I've also been surprised somewhat that spammers haven't reacted
to greylisting still. I thought the technique would be invalid by now
because the minute ratware/malware starts properly following the 4xx
rules, the
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:08:59AM +0100, Tomasz Ostrowski wrote:
You're right. Although e-mail is often misused for file transfer -
ooh, a cool mpeg, let's e-mail it to all my friends.
Indeed. In a week we are implementing a feature to remove multimedia
files from emails using MIMEDefang and
11 matches
Mail list logo
