It just means one of your variables in that md_syslog is undef. You can
safely ignore the error if the spf query routine can correctly return undef.
You could also try adding this to your mimedefang-filter and try and hide
the messages:
use warnings;
no warnings 'uninitialized';
I'm getting
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
use warnings;
no warnings 'uninitialized';
Don't do that.
Perl is trying to tell you something. It's better to track down and
fix the problem than to hide it.
Regards,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other
David wrote:
use warnings;
no warnings 'uninitialized';
Don't do that.
Perl is trying to tell you something. It's better to track down and
fix the problem than to hide it.
Agreed. I've tried to keep straight those variables that are local /
global, those that are passed back and forth
Hi David,
Have you already tried Mimedefang together with SA 3.1.1 ?
I've experienced some problems with slaves getting idle and
not processing anymore anything after some timeout in pyzor,
razor, dcc has occured.
The Changelog of SA 3.1.1. reads:
Bug 4696: consolidated fixes for timeout bugs
Martin Blapp wrote:
Have you already tried Mimedefang together with SA 3.1.1 ?
Yes, I'm running it in production.
I've experienced some problems with slaves getting idle and
not processing anymore anything after some timeout in pyzor,
razor, dcc has occured.
Ah. I don't use pyzor, razor
Hi,
package Mail::SpamAssassin::Dns;
1;
package Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus;
I see. What is the impact of this ? Return value always true ?
Martin
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it
Martin Blapp wrote:
package Mail::SpamAssassin::Dns;
1;
package Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus;
I see. What is the impact of this ? Return value always true ?
The impact of this is that if you're looking for the definition of
the subroutine
HI.
As some have already suggested to you, I did the following on my small
MD server to improve performance of outgoing mail:
1. I have disabled antispam checking for outgoing mail, using the
following:
It is up to you to decide if you want to skip spamassassin check for
outgoing mail or
Ken Cormack wrote:
Is anyone else using the same SPF query code (from Keith Patton -
http://www.mimedefang.org/kwiki/index.cgi?IntegratingSPF )- as I am,
and noticing any errors? Anyone have any ideas which value might be
coming back undefined?
I'm using the code (slightly modified) but I'm
Matthew van Eerde wrote:
Ken Cormack wrote:
Is anyone else using the same SPF query code (from Keith Patton -
http://www.mimedefang.org/kwiki/index.cgi?IntegratingSPF )- as I am,
and noticing any errors? Anyone have any ideas which value might be
coming back undefined?
I'm using the code
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:28 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
(Oh, and by the way: If any SpamAssassin developers are on the list, could
you please fire whoever wrote this in Dns.pm:
package Mail::SpamAssassin::Dns;
1;
package Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus;
Thanks!)
Has this
11 matches
Mail list logo
